Teams

Team 1 Topspin Lobsters

2025 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-29vs Team 6 Merchants of TennisLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Wang / Cecile Hult vs Aravind Krishna / Natilee Festa6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2025-03-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesAustin Longacre / Pilar Falo vs Brandon Kondis / Kristina Heino7-5, 6-1
2025-03-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPilar Falo / Austin Longacre vs Amelia Lawson / Barrett Redington3-6, 1-5
2025-02-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAustin Longacre / Pilar Falo vs Diego Alejandro Parada / Lindsay Bazydlo3-6, 6-7
2025-02-02vs Team 3 String TheoryWon 10
W#2 DoublesAustin Longacre / Pilar Falo vs Zachary Jones / Alexandra Phillips6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
Austin Longacre
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.81
Cecile Hult
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.63
Jeremy Mancus
published
4.44
Changfu Xiao
published 4.5
4.38
Shannon Young
published
4.27
Ye Hu
published
4.25
Phat Bui
published
4.25
Amanda Grotos
published 4.5
4.10
Stephanie Pitts
published
4.08
Sabrina Leguizamon
published
3.90
Cindy Pham
published 4.5
3.63
Pilar Falo
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Francisco Santos
published 4
Richard Wang
published
Thomas McGuire
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ye Hu + Phat Bui033 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Mancus + Stephanie Pitts213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Austin Longacre
64W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.92
5
Cecile Hult
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
4.81
Jeremy Mancus
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
4.63
4.5
Changfu Xiao
109W–42L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
4.44
Shannon Young
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
4.38
Ye Hu
31W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
Phat Bui
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Amanda Grotos
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
Stephanie Pitts
58W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
4.10
Sabrina Leguizamon
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Cindy Pham
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.90
4
Pilar Falo
91W–79L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Francisco Santos
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Richard Wang
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas McGuire
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.