Teams

NAZ/Hackerott/18&Over/3.5M

2023 Adult 18 & Over - NAZ · NAZ 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-08vs Danner/BearchellWon 31
W#1 DoublesJacob Zierenberg / David Logan vs Michael Chan / Craig Bearchell6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBrian Harbeck vs Derek Miller0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesFrank Cox / Peter Stivers vs Steven Danner / Steve Hannah6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBill Bartling / Mark Kaiser vs Ron Gray / Gary Vallen6-3, 6-1
2023-04-08vs Danner/BearchellWon 31
W#1 DoublesFrank Cox / Nick Murray vs Aaron Cirzan / Bob Guzley6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJacob Zierenberg vs Matt Holt6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesArthur Moorhead / Bill Bartling vs Ron Gray / Anthony Medina3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPeter Stivers / Brian Harbeck vs Craig Bearchell / Gary Vallen6-3, 6-0
2023-04-01vs Danner/BearchellLost 12
W#1 DoublesJacob Zierenberg / Everest Hackerott vs Michael Chan / Bob Guzley6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNick Murray / David Logan vs Jacob Bordelon / Bob Boyer4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMark Kaiser / Arthur Moorhead vs Steven Danner / Steve Hannah5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-01vs Danner/BearchellSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEverest Hackerott / Jacob Zierenberg vs Michael Chan / Derek Miller6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNick Murray vs Jacob Bordelon4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMark Kaiser / David Logan vs Bob Boyer / Steven Danner1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesArthur Moorhead / Donald Hildreth vs Anthony Medina / Gary Vallen6-1, 6-0
2023-03-25vs Danner/BearchellWon 40
W#1 DoublesEverest Hackerott / Brian Harbeck vs Michael Chan / Matt Holt6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesFrank Cox vs Krzysztof Pietrzak6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNick Murray / Bill Bartling vs Gordon Medford / Derek Miller6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRonald Strong / Arthur Moorhead vs Craig Bearchell / Anthony Medina6-1, 6-1
2023-03-25vs Danner/BearchellWon 31
W#1 DoublesEverest Hackerott / Frank Cox vs Derek Miller / Krzysztof Pietrzak7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNick Murray vs Matt Holt6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrian Harbeck / Ronald Strong vs Michael Chan / Gordon Medford6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPeter Stivers / Donald Hildreth vs Steven Danner / Anthony Medina6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-03-04vs Danner/BearchellWon 40
W#1 DoublesFrank Cox / Everest Hackerott vs Derek Miller / Mark Buckholz6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesPeter Stivers vs Aaron Cirzan6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJacob Zierenberg / Nick Murray vs Jacob Bordelon / Bob Guzley2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Harbeck / Ronald Strong vs Steve Hannah / Ron Gray6-0, 6-1
2023-03-04vs Danner/BearchellWon 40
W#1 DoublesEverest Hackerott / Jacob Zierenberg vs Derek Miller / Aaron Cirzan6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesFrank Cox vs Jacob Bordelon6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBill Bartling / Nick Murray vs Bob Boyer / Mark Buckholz6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesArthur Moorhead / Donald Hildreth vs Bob Guzley / Steve Hannah6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NAZ 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Zachary Hackerott
published
3.62
Everest Hackerott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Frank Cox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.42
Nick Murray
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.39
David Logan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Arthur Moorhead
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Bill Bartling
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jacob Zierenberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.07
Brian Harbeck
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.06
Mark Kaiser
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Peter Stivers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Donald Hildreth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bill Bartling + David Logan314 matchesnot enough data
Everest Hackerott + Jacob Zierenberg303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Hackerott
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Everest Hackerott
10W–4L career · 6 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Frank Cox
7W–4L career · type S · 6 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Nick Murray
30W–15L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
David Logan
23W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Arthur Moorhead
12W–4L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Bill Bartling
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Jacob Zierenberg
22W–2L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Brian Harbeck
13W–15L career · 5 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
Mark Kaiser
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Peter Stivers
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99
Donald Hildreth
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.