Teams

EW-YTC-DeGrasse

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 MEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.96 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-01vs EW-Peak-CattellLost 04
L#1 DoublesKelly Richelderfer / Jeff Brantner vs Kevin Tweed / Doug Conboy4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJohn Erb vs Mark Kuzyk2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJim Stewart / Richard Lozano vs Philip Anderson / Jeff Woodie1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJames Degrasse / David Elofson vs John Williams / John Cattell3-6, 1-6
2025-06-01vs PFC - The Dude AbidesSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJohn Erb / Jeff Brantner vs Kevin Jones / Tom Timperman2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Richelderfer vs Steven Douglas6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Lozano / Jim Stewart vs Rahul Sharma / Carl Warring6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDanny Mullins / David Elofson vs Chris Ryan / James Cramer4-6, 2-6
2025-05-31vs PFC - The Dude AbidesSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRobert Schefter / Bob Schefter vs Chris Ryan / Carl Bruscoe6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Erb vs Ryan Jensen6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJeff Brantner / David Elofson vs Rahul Sharma / Kevin Jones2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJames Degrasse / Danny Mullins vs Jason Ladum / Zane Schafer1-6, 5-7
2025-05-31vs PC - ColclasureSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBob Schefter / Robert Schefter vs Lee Colclasure / Jim Perry6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJohn Erb vs Jamie Carter6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRichard Lozano / David Elofson vs Matthew Crusselle / David Jones1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Degrasse / Jim Stewart vs Asif Malik / Adam Hrebeniuk0-6, 3-6
2025-05-30vs PC - ColclasureWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid Garent / Richard Lozano vs Steven McMurray / Gordon Slysz7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Richelderfer vs Larry Floyd6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRobert Schefter / Bob Schefter vs Lee Colclasure / Jim Perry6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDavid Elofson / Jeff Brantner vs Asif Malik / Adam Hrebeniuk2-6, 3-6
2025-05-30vs EW-Peak-CattellWon 40
W#1 DoublesBob Schefter / Robert Schefter vs Kevin Tweed / John Williams3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKelly Richelderfer vs Scott Anderson6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJohn Erb / Jim Stewart vs Guy Schneider / Doug Conboy7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRichard Lozano / David Garent vs Tim Qualls / John Cattell7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Robert Schefter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Jeff Brantner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.89
Kelly Richelderfer
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Dan Plath
published 4
Bob Schefter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
David Garent
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
John Erb
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.69
Jim Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.68
Richard Lozano
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.66
David Elofson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
James Degrasse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Danny Mullins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Plath + Kelly Richelderfer11657% games+5.5% vs expected
Richard Lozano + Jim Stewart111249% games+0.1% vs expected
David Elofson + Jeff Brantner51151% games−2.4% vs expected
Richard Lozano + James Degrasse41340% games−12.3% vs expected
David Elofson + Robert Schefter12654% gamesnot enough data
Richard Lozano + Robert Schefter7263% gamesnot enough data
James Degrasse + Danny Mullins3537% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Brantner + Richard Lozano4361% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Robert Schefter
55W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
4.09
4
Jeff Brantner
38W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Kelly Richelderfer
59W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Dan Plath
56W–48L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Bob Schefter
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
David Garent
11W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
John Erb
20W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Jim Stewart
32W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Richard Lozano
92W–93L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
David Elofson
37W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
James Degrasse
34W–82L career · 3 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Danny Mullins
33W–53L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.