Teams

LSLE-Lerme/ Jetton

2024 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-10vs LKNO-Norcross/CRPLost 12
W#1 DoublesTrish Behnke / Linda Dove vs Caroline Ray / Michelle Noglows6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Packard / Julie Coughlin vs Christina Gray / Melissa Smith3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesLori Kitchens / Kim Kelly Senff vs Lisa Schacher / Keri Norcross2-6, 1-6
2024-05-03vs LLMO-Moyer-Foreman/JettonLost 02
L#2 DoublesJessica Benningfield / Debra Jessup vs Elizabeth Mangano / Michelle Potuzak1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Coughlin / Beth Packard vs Jennifer Jenkins / Alison Siebold2-6, 0-6
2024-04-26vs LAED-Edenfield/LNRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Packard / Lori Kitchens vs Jennifer Higgins / Barbara Kosior0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Jessup / Kim Kelly Senff vs SHARON WELLS / Filomena Ferri2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Plaster / Julie Coughlin vs Tracey McKenna / Mary Beth Thomas2-6, 4-6
2024-04-19vs LKRobbins/RRLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica Benningfield / Linda Dove vs Christina Tarry / Barbara-Anne Parsons6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Plaster / Lori Kitchens vs Pamela Zamora / Cindy Aprile3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesLisa Smith / Debra Jessup vs Kathleen Navola / Patricia Sharawy0-6, 2-6
2024-04-12vs LEKR-Krogstie/WestportLost 12
L#2 DoublesLinda Dove / Dina White vs Christy Bolick / Shaun Simmer1-4
L#3 DoublesSherry Lerme / Jennifer Plaster vs Helen Bugg / Lisa Kachulis3-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesKim Kelly Senff / Debra Jessup vs Sharyn Darden / Kathleen Cassino7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2024-03-28vs LABO-Bonham/NMP 40+ 4.0Won 40
W#1 SinglesJessica Benningfield vs Kristine Bienstock6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Dove / Dina White vs Stephanie Clancy / Donna Strauss6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Plaster / Kim Kelly Senff vs Cindy Japec / Anna Bonham6-4, 3-5
W#4 DoublesDebra Jessup / Lori Kitchens vs Karen Haigney / Sheryl Chapman7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2024-03-22vs LABR-Brandon-LNRCLost 04
L#1 DoublesJessica Benningfield / Jill Conlin vs Jane Ravey / Susan Davis2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBeth Packard / PALOMA LOPEZ vs Lisa Yee / Amy Brandon0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Coughlin / Kim Kelly Senff vs Charlene Whichel / Kirsten Morin1-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesDebra Jessup / Lori Kitchens vs Shannon Hirschfeld / Julie Mudge0-6, 2-6
2024-03-16vs LAJO-JONES/JETTONLost 12
W#1 DoublesDina White / Linda Dove vs Lin Altamura / Maryann Bruce6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBeth Packard / Julie Coughlin vs Tracie Persinger / Karen Ray3-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesSherry Lerme / Lisa Smith vs Mary Kay Portaro / Louise Brown0-6, 2-6
2024-03-08vs TDU-Dudan/JettonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLinda Dove / Trish Behnke vs Brenda Martinez / Cynthia Delay3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Plaster / Sheri Borders vs Ann Hughes / Andrea McRorie4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Linda Dove
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Jessica Benningfield
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.49
Kim Kelly Senff
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 3.5
3.47
PALOMA LOPEZ
published
3.44
Dina White
published
3.41
Trish Behnke
published
3.28
Sherry Lerme
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Jill Conlin
published
3.14
Lori Kitchens
published
3.06
Debra Jessup
usually #4 Doubles 69%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published 3.5
3.04
Beth Packard
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.02
Jennifer Plaster
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Lerme + Beth Packard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Linda Dove
67W–64L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Jessica Benningfield
100W–67L career · 12 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Kim Kelly Senff
144W–103L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
PALOMA LOPEZ
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
Dina White
19W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Trish Behnke
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Sherry Lerme
90W–106L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Jill Conlin
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Lori Kitchens
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Debra Jessup
10W–21L career · 13 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Beth Packard
77W–149L career · 13 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Jennifer Plaster
119W–119L career · 11 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.