Teams

FC-Aged to Perfection 3.0-Wallach

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.89 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-02vs BC-LeahySplit 22
W#1 DoublesElaine Hoy / Rachel Wallach vs Anne Bentley / Anne Bratton7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesMJ Kimm vs Kathryn Wenger3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Ambrose / Edith Matulka vs Jennifer LaMoria / Ann Lampman7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesXIAOOU ZHUANG / Naomi Mora vs Grace Newman / Lavina Poorswani4-6, 3-6
2024-02-25vs AYTC-Serving It Up-BorgoniaLost 13
L#1 DoublesElaine Hoy / Rachel Wallach vs Cheryl Borgonia / Caitlin McConnico5-7, 7-6
L#1 SinglesXIAOOU ZHUANG vs Alana Holmquist6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Ambrose / Edith Matulka vs Mary Cropp / Katarina Powell6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Kandace Barnes vs Jesenka Berberovich / Elizabeth Parker3-6, 1-6
2024-02-17vs CAC/SL-We’ve Got Ballz-McCarronLost 13
L#1 DoublesKelly Ambrose / Christina Vanburen vs Julie Dewitt / Carolyn Smith1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRachel Wallach vs Emily Jackson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesXIAOOU ZHUANG / Naomi Mora vs Kim Foley / Lisa Gluth0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Kandace Barnes vs Lindsey Brandt / Vandella Stewart2-6, 4-6
2024-02-10vs BETC-WuSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNaomi Mora / Victoria van Gelderen vs Kyung Mi Lee / MaryAnn O'Connell1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCarisa Betancourt vs Mary Jordan0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAdriana Lopes / Edith Matulka vs Carol Markham / Leslie Ekas6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristina Vanburen / Kelly Ambrose vs Tiffany Hicks / Jackie Armstrong6-0, 7-5
2024-02-03vs TCSP-Lusty/VincentSplit 22
W#1 DoublesElaine Hoy / Rachel Wallach vs Bonnie Ziegler / Suzan Mazor7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMJ Kimm vs Lora Brennan2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdriana Lopes / Edith Matulka vs Heather Mathews / Deborah Rappaport3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Ambrose / Victoria van Gelderen vs Shannon Pflugrath / Dawn Spratley0-6, 4-6
2024-01-21vs ETC-Go Bloom-Grotle 3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesElaine Hoy / Christina Vanburen vs Oxana Aelion / Jacky Grotle2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesXIAOOU ZHUANG vs Proshat Parsimoghadam2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Ambrose / Adriana Lopes vs Evelyn Wong / Susan Lin2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMJ Kimm / Naomi Mora vs Barbara Travers / Lisa C3-6, 0-6
2024-01-13vs NTC-All In-SteckWon 31
W#1 DoublesRachel Wallach / Christina Vanburen vs Christine Henn / Catherine Maxson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElaine Hoy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAdriana Lopes / Edith Matulka vs Margaret Steck / Tzu-Chin Lin6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMJ Kimm / XIAOOU ZHUANG vs Kristen Sycamore / Natalie Matthews6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-01-07vs RTC-Party at the Net-KrammerLost 13
L#1 DoublesElaine Hoy / MJ Kimm vs Tammi Tompkins / Soo Chin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRachel Wallach vs DONGMIN LIU6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNaomi Mora / Kelly Ambrose vs Nancy Rodriguez / Cynthia Padilla3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Victoria van Gelderen vs Margaret Landry-Navarro / Karen Ng4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-TCSP-Tarte8026616229
2ETC-Go Bloom-Grotle 3.08023922222
3NWW-MI-Perret8130613226
4CP-TNT-Ye81261026275
5CAC/SL-Net Nuts-Coley7124820228
6CAC/SL-We’ve Got Ballz-McCarron7123922213
7BC-Bloch71221023259
8EDG-Chicks with Sticks-Morikubo71221025272
9AYTC-Double Shots-Hofler72251123240
10TCSP-Mixed Troubles 3.0-Stansfield72251127271
11BETC-Garcia72231330289
12NTC-Falcons-Wood72211538321
13PSC-Lu6223924231
14NTC-Kennedy62211128247
15BAIN-The Volley Partons-Fanberg63251124293
16RTC-Party at the Net-Krammer53181433285
17MC-W 3.0-LaRosa/White53181435275
18STC-Slay Belles-Stroble54231330274
19RBW-Group Therapy-English54191741328
20PSC-Azure-Petriuc54181843321
21AYTC-Pickled Eggs-Bauer54162045353
22BC-Leahy44181431270
23TCSP-Lusty/Vincent44171534284
24AYTC-Serving It Up-Borgonia44161637291
25CP-Victorious-Dauphiny Becker44151739292
26STC-Volley Vixens-Crabs44131941320
27BETC-Porter/Ikeda 40+ 202435161636292
28HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda35131937308
29MI-Laban35141843311
30PL-Rams-Friedman36191742335
31HBSQ-This is 40-Love-Siegrist36142248338
32AYTC-Unforced Terror-Viera26141841317
33FC-Sharma26151741318
34RBW-Jordt26122042320
35NTC-All In-Steck2682451344
36NTC-Team 2.87-Willgerodt2672554342
37BC-Tursa/Anderson27122452368
38TCSP-Down the Line-Buscher27112552361
39WSC-Independent Funsters 2024-Milter27122454372
40BC-McGuire2792755386
41ETC-Brown27102657387
42FC-Aged to Perfection 3.0-Wallach17122042309
43BETC-Wu1792349332
44RBW-Longhorn-Zheng0923469425

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Rachel Wallach
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.03
Elaine Hoy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.98
Edith Matulka
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.93
Christina Vanburen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Naomi Mora
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.67
XIAOOU ZHUANG
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.49
Adriana Lopes
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.31
Victoria van Gelderen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.30
Kandace Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.13
Carisa Betancourt
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 2.5
MJ Kimm
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Naomi Mora + Victoria van Gelderen4263% games+8.1% vs expected
Elaine Hoy + Rachel Wallach81049% games+1.2% vs expected
Carisa Betancourt + Kandace Barnes4547% games+1.1% vs expected
Adriana Lopes + Edith Matulka3260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rachel Wallach
88W–78L career · 11 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Elaine Hoy
120W–116L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Edith Matulka
63W–19L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%55%44%
2.98
3
Christina Vanburen
32W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Naomi Mora
52W–52L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
3
XIAOOU ZHUANG
20W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Adriana Lopes
60W–55L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%52%48%
2.49
2.5
Victoria van Gelderen
12W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%92%8%
2.31
Kandace Barnes
14W–25L career · 8 lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
2.30
2.5
Carisa Betancourt
54W–111L career · 11 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
MJ Kimm
15W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.