Teams

CSU GREEN

2024 ITA MIXED - NOCO · MIXED 8.5 - ITA - NOCO

13 players · average NTRP 4.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-25vs CSU WHITEWon 10
W#1 DoublesDylan Hatanelas / Meredith McClellan vs Thomas Carson / Priscilla Dressen6-4, 6-2
2024-08-18vs LT BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesDylan Hatanelas / Kimberly Tomlinson vs Kim Phillips / Matthew Martinez7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElliot Graham / Amanda Repert vs Lynn Arenson / Robert Herrera6-2, 6-2
2024-08-18vs LVTA REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesJesse Chavez / Amanda Repert vs Colby Mueller / Erin Hauser-Roe3-6, 4-6
2024-08-09vs CSU GOLDWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmanda Repert / Bryce Melcher vs Elina George / Tyler Hempstead6-3, 6-1
2024-07-22vs LVTA REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesMeredith McClellan / Dylan Hatanelas vs Kelsey Keene / Nicholas Roe3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-21vs CSU WHITEWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmanda Repert / Bryce Melcher vs Susan Boyle / Jeran Krause7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.5 - ITA - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Dylan Hatanelas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Mitzi Johnson
published
Elliot Graham
published 4.5
4.20
Susanna Styve
published 4.5
4.18
Christine Pelletier
published 4.5
4.16
Jesse Chavez
published
4.15
Amanda Repert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Austin Stege
published 4.5
4.12
Bryce Melcher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Kimberly Tomlinson
published
3.94
Lourdes Buck
published
3.92
Meredith McClellan
published
Greg Stampfli
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jesse Chavez + Christine Pelletier4253% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Repert + Bryce Melcher3257% gamesnot enough data
Jesse Chavez + Susanna Styve134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dylan Hatanelas
24W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
4.46
Mitzi Johnson
44W–45L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Elliot Graham
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Susanna Styve
81W–45L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Christine Pelletier
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
4.18
Jesse Chavez
40W–29L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Amanda Repert
75W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Austin Stege
41W–51L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Bryce Melcher
18W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
4.12
Kimberly Tomlinson
40W–38L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.94
Lourdes Buck
7W–20L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.94
Meredith McClellan
22W–10L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
Greg Stampfli
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.