Teams

Webster - Mixed 40+ 4.0 - Monday

2024 Piedmont Mixed 40 & Over · 4.0 Mixed Dbls Mon PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-15vs Rossato - Mixed 40s 4.0 MonWon 20
W#2 DoublesFrank Kincaid / Libby Strickland vs Lesley Rossato / Martin Rossato6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesEvelyn Strader / Peter Glud vs Benjamin Herrick / Karen Lubeck Smith6-4, 6-1
2024-07-08vs Robb - Mixed 40s 4.0 MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeter Glud / Libby Strickland vs Frank Azzarita / Jennifer Jacobs1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-07-01vs DEAN - Mixed 40s 4.0 MonLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Glud / Evelyn Strader vs Marla Barnwell / Enno de Vries1-6, 4-6
2024-06-24vs Bryce - Mixed 40+ 4.0 - MonLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobin Andree / Libby Strickland vs Elisabeth Kraska / Myron Herron6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-17vs Davis - Mixed 40s 4.0 MonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / Frank Kincaid vs Kathryn Egerton / Jeremy Madrazo2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEvelyn Strader / Peter Glud vs Gina Goy / Corey Davis2-6, 3-6
2024-06-03vs Price - Mixed 40+ 4.0 - Mon..Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Strader / Peter Glud vs Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan / Joann Hartzell2-6, 4-6
2024-05-20vs Rossato - Mixed 40s 4.0 MonLost 01
L#2 DoublesLibby Strickland / Charles Bolton vs Eileen Gillis / Mark Gillis6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed Dbls Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Frank Kincaid
published 4
3.69
Libby Strickland
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.56
Lynn Chafin
published
3.54
Gwenda Priest
published 4
3.51
Peter Glud
published
3.46
Keevie Martin
published
3.45
Evelyn Strader
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.37
Suzanne Rudy
published
Robin Andree
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evelyn Strader + Peter Glud3448% gamesnot enough data
Robin Andree + Keevie Martin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Frank Kincaid
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Libby Strickland
128W–110L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Lynn Chafin
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.56
4
Gwenda Priest
2W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
Peter Glud
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
Keevie Martin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46
4
Evelyn Strader
66W–110L career · 4 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.45
Suzanne Rudy
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.37
Robin Andree
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.