Teams

WNCS Hamilton (BFCC)

Adult 18 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 18+ Adult Women 2.5 Thurs

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-21vs WNCL Wilson (Aston Park)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLauren Colvard / Michele Gaines vs Liesl Case / Maria Briggs6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnna Groome / Christine Lewis vs Debra Maddox / Oli Grice5-7, 3-6
2026-05-15vs WNCG Hogan (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Hamilton / Megan Thorp vs Golnar Gorbachevskiy / Georgiana Hogan3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLauren Colvard vs Barbara Ray2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Schultz / Anna Groome vs Kristin Connor / Camellia Asgarian2-6, 1-6
2026-05-07vs WNCG Hogan (ARC South)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca Schultz / Megan Thorp vs Paola Navarrete / Barbara Williams7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-30vs WNCL Wilson (Aston Park)Split 11
L#1 SinglesMichele Gaines vs Lindsey Wilson1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Groome / Christine Lewis vs Jessi Herr / Oli Grice1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-24vs WNCM Krasne (CCA)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMegan Thorp / Lauren Colvard vs Ashley Torres / Dana Hilty3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Gaines / Sarah Hamilton vs Virginia Gajewski / Caley Bowman6-1, 6-4
2026-04-23vs WNCM Krasne (CCA)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Shaw / Michele Gaines vs Dana Hilty / Janise Silverman3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Schultz / Lauren Colvard vs Mabelle Krasne / Summer Barlow6-3, 6-3
2026-04-16vs WNCL Wilson (Aston Park)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Colvard / Megan Thorp vs Oli Grice / Debra Maddox6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-14vs WNCM Krasne (CCA)Split 11
W#1 DoublesLauren Colvard / Sarah Hamilton vs Virginia Gajewski / Janise Silverman6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKatie Shaw / Anna Groome vs Emily Keenan / Ashley Torres0-6, 2-6
2026-03-26vs WNCG Hogan (ARC South)Split 11
W#1 DoublesLauren Colvard / Rebecca Schultz vs Michelle Klickovich / Barbara Williams6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMichele Gaines vs Camellia Asgarian1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18+ Adult Women 2.5 Thurs
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCL Wilson (Aston Park)63161125212
2WNCG Hogan (ARC South)45141330222
3WNCS Hamilton (BFCC)45141331256
4WNCM Krasne (CCA)45101735245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.33
Lauren Colvard
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.11
Christine Lewis
published 2.5
2.08
Megan Thorp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.02
Anna Groome
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.01
Michele Gaines
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Colvard
4W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Christine Lewis
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Megan Thorp
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
2.5
Anna Groome
1W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Michele Gaines
3W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.