Teams

Lovelady

2024 · 2025 NOGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesJanet Lovelady / Tiffany Laird vs Julie Stokes / Suzi Thorne6-4, 6-2
2024-11-12vs StokesWon 10
W#3 DoublesJanet Lovelady / Kay Henderson vs Julie Stokes / DeAnn Rauth6-2, 7-6
2024-10-14vs BarkerWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Sain / Molly Lambert vs Kate Rolen / April Totherow6-2, 6-3
2024-10-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Sain / Tammy Stewart vs Molly Carlson / Catherine Minor6-4, 6-1
2024-09-30vs BarkerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly Lambert / Connie Corbin vs Nicole Raughton / Isabella Peeples2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-23vs BarkerWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Sain / Molly Lambert vs Tiffany Laird / Isabella Peeples6-4, 6-4
2024-09-09vs BarkerWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Sain / Hannah Joyce vs Debi Williams / Cynthia Stanfield7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 NOGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Connie Corbin
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.94
Lauren Sain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Kay Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.83
Lisa Goble
published
Hannah Joyce
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.75
April Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.48
Janet Lovelady
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Suzi Thorne
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.23
Julie Stokes
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Molly Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Pushpa Bhatter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connie Corbin + April Chambers9066% games+14.8% vs expected
Connie Corbin + Kay Henderson6159% games+7.8% vs expected
Lauren Sain + Kay Henderson7266% games+0.2% vs expected
Suzi Thorne + Julie Stokes01218% games−16.3% vs expected
Janet Lovelady + Kay Henderson2339% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Sain + Molly Lambert404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Connie Corbin
38W–15L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Lauren Sain
21W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
Kay Henderson
49W–40L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Lisa Goble
19W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Hannah Joyce
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
April Chambers
22W–40L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Janet Lovelady
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Suzi Thorne
2W–24L career · 8 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Julie Stokes
1W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.23
Molly Lambert
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pushpa Bhatter
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.