Teams

SB-LLW-Muffin Tops-Jaclyn Park

Adult 55 & Over - SB · Women 8.0 Combo Doubles

15 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-06vs SBTC-55 & FabulousWon 10
W#1 DoublesSally Jordan / Michelle Seagraves vs Jeppe Madsen / Susan McMillan6-4, 6-2
2023-07-30vs SBTC-55 & FabulousWon 20
W#2 DoublesBecky Winchester / Michelle Seagraves vs Debbie Rhodes / Amy Jakobson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJaclyn Park / Susan Rettig vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-09vs SBTC-55 & FabulousWon 10
W#3 DoublesJaclyn Park / Becky Winchester vs Samantha Ireland / Amy Jakobson6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.0 Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Beth Ford
published 4
3.83
Gigi Hollister
published 4
3.80
Nancy Garrison
published
3.73
Paula Skokowski
published 4
3.61
Deborah Carlen
published 4
3.49
Rosemary Talmadge
published
3.49
Michelle Seagraves
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Donna Econn
published 4
3.46
Patricia English
published
3.30
Jaclyn Park
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Susan Rettig
published
3.19
Sally Jordan
published
Becky Winchester
published
Roxanne Clare
published
Terrie Bugay
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Carlen + Paula Skokowski11357% games+5.3% vs expected
Rosemary Talmadge + Patricia English7749% games−6.1% vs expected
Rosemary Talmadge + Gigi Hollister3843% games−7.0% vs expected
Sally Jordan + Beth Ford4257% gamesnot enough data
Beth Ford + Terrie Bugay5067% gamesnot enough data
Sally Jordan + Roxanne Clare224 matchesnot enough data
Sally Jordan + Terrie Bugay314 matchesnot enough data
Patricia English + Donna Econn044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Ford
89W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Gigi Hollister
30W–26L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
Nancy Garrison
31W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Paula Skokowski
51W–34L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Deborah Carlen
24W–19L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.61
Rosemary Talmadge
33W–44L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
4
Michelle Seagraves
41W–15L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Donna Econn
7W–23L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
Patricia English
28W–39L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.46
3.5
Jaclyn Park
86W–80L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Susan Rettig
13W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
Sally Jordan
38W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.19
Becky Winchester
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roxanne Clare
20W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Terrie Bugay
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.