Teams

MTC - Cooper

2025 Adult 18 & Over Men Winter - Mobile · 3.5 Men Winter

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-25vs MO - Nguyen 3.5Lost 23
L#1 DoublesBryan Cooper / Ernest Ladd vs Evan Butlig / David Thomas Wallace0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesThomas Jackson vs Davis Hall6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesErnest Ladd / Howard Galloway II vs James Nguyen / Joey Huettemann7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRichard Kirkpatrick vs Jacob Cassity6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesWill Fusaiotti / John Abruscato vs Pasang Sherpa / Douglas Wruck2-6, 1-6
2025-02-11vs MO - Nguyen 3.5Won 32
W#1 DoublesDavid Gilmore / Patrick McPhillips vs David Wallace / JT Hornbuckle6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesThomas Jackson vs Alexis Jean2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesChris Bonham / Darren Barrett vs Reeve Cabral / Gregory Kendall5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRichard Kirkpatrick vs James Nguyen5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErnest Ladd / Howard Galloway II vs Douglas Wruck / Davis Hall2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Richard Kirkpatrick
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.47
Patrick McPhillips
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Darren Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Thomas Jackson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.36
David Gilmore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Chris Bonham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
John McAnnally
published
3.29
Will Fusaiotti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Howard Galloway II
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Darius Bennett
published 3
2.93
Bryan Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
John Abruscato
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Gilmore + Patrick McPhillips404 matchesnot enough data
John McAnnally + Howard Galloway II224 matchesnot enough data
John McAnnally + Darren Barrett213 matchesnot enough data
Darren Barrett + Howard Galloway II303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Kirkpatrick
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Patrick McPhillips
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Darren Barrett
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Thomas Jackson
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
David Gilmore
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Chris Bonham
19W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
John McAnnally
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Will Fusaiotti
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Howard Galloway II
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3
Darius Bennett
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Bryan Cooper
10W–18L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
John Abruscato
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.