Teams

MARIN TC 18MX9.0A

2024 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX9.0

25 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anton Stryhas
published 5.5
4.88
Lisa Everest
published
4.38
Jennifer Mills
published
4.36
Kristin Morrell
published
4.29
Kevin Erickson
published
4.26
4.26
Elizabeth Shalev
published
Chris Trepte
published 4.5
4.24
Christopher Brawer
published 4.5
4.22
Melanie Beardslee
published
4.21
Kiran F Narsinh
published
4.20
Loren Quaglieri
published 4.5
4.18
Sugi Bernard
published
4.12
Kira Deguchi
published
4.07
Jonathan Lefferts
published
3.88
Lisa Eastlack
published
3.87
3.79
Robert Ahearn
published
3.68
Jason Holmes
published
3.65
Elaine Kitano
published
3.62
Thomas Chang
published
3.58
Susan Swezy
published
Jeffery Birkenseer
published
Jerod Mah
published
Pramote Phejtrakul
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jerod Mah + Kira Deguchi044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5.5
Anton Stryhas
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Everest
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.88
Jennifer Mills
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
4.38
Kristin Morrell
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.36
Kevin Erickson
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
Kimberly Borah-Schulist
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.26
Elizabeth Shalev
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Chris Trepte
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Christopher Brawer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
Melanie Beardslee
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
4.22
Kiran F Narsinh
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
4.21
4.5
Loren Quaglieri
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
4.20
Sugi Bernard
20W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
4.18
Kira Deguchi
0W–13L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.12
Jonathan Lefferts
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
Lisa Eastlack
39W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
Michael Lustenberger
18W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.87
Robert Ahearn
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Jason Holmes
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Elaine Kitano
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Thomas Chang
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.62
Susan Swezy
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Jeffery Birkenseer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jerod Mah
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pramote Phejtrakul
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.