Teams

MLohnes (Park Road)

2026 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 4.5 - Wed PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-23vs CGardner (Alexander St Park)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMadison Lohnes / Marcus Wege vs Diego Gonzalez / Sunny Bowers4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Comisar / Bridget Johnson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-15vs DJKarasik (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Gillum / Darnaye Black vs Jennifer Anderson / Luke Mixon1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMadison Lohnes / Daniel Comisar vs Jackie Gaine / Chris Lawyer7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMadeline Weih / Aditya Khanna vs Melissa Lyles / DJ Karasik4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-07-12vs CGardner (Alexander St Park)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMadeline Weih / Joshua Mu vs Caroline Frank / Diego Gonzalez2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJacob Scheinler / Madison Lohnes vs Ravi Mujumdar / Emma Carver7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Smith / Charlotte Gillum vs Toni Laney / Christopher Love4-6, 4-5
2026-07-08vs BGrich (Mason Wallace)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDarnaye Black / Maria Emilia de la Orden vs Carrie Dunham / Shivam Desai6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCharlotte Gillum / Marcus Wege vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-24vs DJKarasik (Park Road)Won 21
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Gillum / James Smith vs DJ Karasik / Jordan Bowers6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBridget Johnson / Marcus Wege vs Anthony Yang / Darri Thayaprasat4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Diaz / Daniel Comisar vs Chris Lawyer / Brittany Simpson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-17vs BGrich (Mason Wallace)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDarnaye Black / Kimberly Diaz vs Anna Sharp / Alex Beurle4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMadison Lohnes / Joshua Mu vs Tinsley Birchfield / Shivam Desai6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaria Emilia de la Orden / Marcus Wege vs Myriam Sarment / Jared McKiernan6-2, 6-1
2026-06-10vs CGardner (Alexander St Park)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMadison Lohnes / James Smith vs Christopher Gardner / Toni Laney4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBridget Johnson / Daniel Comisar vs Caroline Frank / Sahil Vasa1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAditya Khanna / Madeline Weih vs Ravi Mujumdar / Diana West0-6, 2-6
2026-06-03vs DJKarasik (Park Road)Won 21
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Gillum / Jacob Scheinler vs Jordan Bowers / Anthony Yang6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBridget Johnson / Joshua Mu vs Jennifer Anderson / Chase Lyles4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Emilia de la Orden / Daniel Comisar vs Alexis Kaiser / DJ Karasik6-3, 6-4
2026-05-27vs BGrich (Mason Wallace)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMadison Lohnes / Jacob Scheinler vs Grayson White / Tinsley Birchfield6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMadeline Weih / Joshua Mu vs Jon Michael Thomas / Molli Heisler6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDarnaye Black / Kimberly Diaz vs Jackson Pye / Anna Gay7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18 & Over Mixed 4.5 - Wed PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CGardner (Alexander St Park)8121615182
2MLohnes (Park Road)63171022193
3DJKarasik (Park Road)45131432241
4BGrich (Mason Wallace)0932450313

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Charlotte Gillum
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.33
Madison Lohnes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Kimberly Diaz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.28
Jacob Scheinler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.28
Daniel Comisar
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.27
Bridget Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Maria Emilia de la Orden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.22
Marcus Wege
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.12
Madeline Weih
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.08
Darnaye Black
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.95
Joshua Mu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.76
Aditya Khanna
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcus Wege + Bridget Johnson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charlotte Gillum
19W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Madison Lohnes
73W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.33
Kimberly Diaz
32W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Jacob Scheinler
2W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Daniel Comisar
90W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Bridget Johnson
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
Maria Emilia de la Orden
36W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Marcus Wege
88W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
4.22
Madeline Weih
24W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Darnaye Black
117W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.08
Joshua Mu
54W–12L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Aditya Khanna
21W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.