Teams

Spalding/Nashville

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 7.5 Women - FRI AM & MON PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-08-18vs Davis/Neal/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Grace Gaines / Noelle Cotey vs Lisa Wallace / Eileen Smith3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBecky Morgan / Melinda Neely vs Celia Turner / JULIE GONTAREK3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Coffman / Anna Chandler vs Shelby Ruehling / Lauren Pollard1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 7.5 Women - FRI AM & MON PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McNabb/Hamlin/Nashville7018311144
2Glickman/Nashville7017412147
3Hermann/Nashville5213818164
4Davis/Neal/Nashville5213818163
5Brooks/Falk/Nashville43111025214
6Grimm/Zwerner/Nashville3491227209
7Spalding/Nashville2561531225
8Marcum/Nashville1651633226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Crystal Wray
published 4
3.62
Joni Covington
published
3.51
Mary Grace Gaines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Noelle Cotey
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.46
Jennifer Kistner
published
Anna Chandler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Suzanne Spalding
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Christina Beattie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Elizabeth States
published 3.5
3.10
Brenda Maddaleni
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.73
Becky Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Melinda Neely
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Crystal Wray + Jennifer Kistner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Crystal Wray
11W–19L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Joni Covington
19W–21L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.62
Mary Grace Gaines
1W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Noelle Cotey
27W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jennifer Kistner
1W–19L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Anna Chandler
0W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Spalding
39W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Christina Beattie
16W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Elizabeth States
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Brenda Maddaleni
26W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Becky Morgan
2W–10L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.73
Melinda Neely
50W–76L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.