Teams

Busby/18/3.5/M/BREC

2026 City Championship 18 & Over - Men · 3.5 (18&O) Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 upcoming
Sep 14 8:00 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Sep 21 6:30 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Sep 28 6:30 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Oct 5 8:00 PM
at Harrison/18/3.5/M/BREC
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Oct 12 6:30 PM
Highland Park Tennis Center
Oct 19 6:30 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Oct 26 6:30 PM
University Club Baton Rouge
Nov 2 6:30 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Nov 9 6:30 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Nov 16 8:00 PM
University Club Baton Rouge

Flight standings for 3.5 (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Blake Carville
published 3.5
3.48
David Bolton
published 3.5
3.46
Matt Dardenne
published
3.42
Michael Torri
published
3.42
Andrew Muhl
published 3.5
3.37
Stephen Manuel
published
3.37
Blake Cowart
published 3.5
3.36
Troy Goings
published
3.35
Tom Crowell
published
3.32
Rodney Terral
published
3.31
Thomas Wafer
published
3.29
Eduardo Carreras
published
3.28
Curren Pitre
published 3.5
3.17
Tyler Busby
published
3.16
Ryan Eschete
published
Nathan Heath
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Muhl + Matt Dardenne4447% games+5.8% vs expected
Troy Goings + Eduardo Carreras404 matchesnot enough data
Troy Goings + Rodney Terral303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Blake Carville
8W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
David Bolton
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Matt Dardenne
15W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Michael Torri
8W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Andrew Muhl
26W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
Stephen Manuel
12W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Blake Cowart
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Troy Goings
27W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
Tom Crowell
34W–23L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Rodney Terral
30W–19L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Thomas Wafer
25W–16L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Eduardo Carreras
16W–19L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Curren Pitre
8W–11L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Tyler Busby
32W–26L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Ryan Eschete
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Nathan Heath
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.