Teams

LOZITO 40+ 8.5 Combo

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 40 & OVER · Men 8.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-01vs Barefoot 40+ ComboLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeremy Lozito / Steve Peterson vs Michael Barefoot / Zachary Tran1-6, 0-3
L#2 DoublesEdwin Wagenseller / Marc Ross vs Hector Sanchez / Ibardo Zambrano4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBryan McCabe / Jason Weddle vs Matt Zayko / David Hartness3-6, 2-6
2026-08-23vs Barefoot 40+ ComboLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrendan Bastable / Johannes Haasbroek vs Zachary Tran / Robert Weins3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Peterson / Bryan McCabe vs Christian Sanchez / Matthew Hilliard1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Lautenbach / Koko Dawood vs Matt Zayko / Eric Jarrell6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-18vs Barefoot 40+ ComboLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrendan Bastable / Mike Voorheis vs Zachary Tran / Jason Ingraham2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Peterson / Marc Ross vs Justin Pugh / Eric Jarrell2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJeremy Lozito / Ben Whitlock vs Hector Sanchez / David Hartness2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 8.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Barefoot 40+ Combo1030017
2LOZITO 40+ 8.5 Combo0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Brendan Bastable
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Marc Ross
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Chris Whitney
published 4
3.76
Johannes Haasbroek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Bryan McCabe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Jason Weddle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Ben Whitlock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Michael Lautenbach
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Jeremy Lozito
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Edwin Wagenseller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Steve Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Mike Voorheis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Koko Dawood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Lautenbach + Marc Ross6265% games+13.5% vs expected
Jeremy Lozito + Steve Peterson2449% games−7.2% vs expected
Steve Peterson + Bryan McCabe314 matchesnot enough data
Ben Whitlock + Mike Voorheis033 matchesnot enough data
Brendan Bastable + Johannes Haasbroek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brendan Bastable
38W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
Marc Ross
14W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Chris Whitney
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
Johannes Haasbroek
33W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Bryan McCabe
224W–123L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
Jason Weddle
43W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Ben Whitlock
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Michael Lautenbach
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Jeremy Lozito
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Edwin Wagenseller
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Steve Peterson
16W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
Mike Voorheis
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57
Koko Dawood
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.