← Teams

GLVR-Schweitz

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Stephen Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 5.5
4.24
Josh Schweitz
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 47% · published 4.5
Results24 ties
2021-09-25Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Mary Klinger vs Ross Laursen / Elizabeth Gorey2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-09-25Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Mary Klinger vs Brenda Williams / Mario Caoile6-0, 6-2
2021-09-24Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Mary Klinger vs Loi Crawford / Kathy Hunter6-4, 6-0
2021-08-29Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesCarl Swanson / Josh Schweitz vs Richard Deitz / Chuong Tran6-4, 6-0
2021-08-28Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesCarl Swanson / Josh Schweitz vs Dustin Hedger / Tuan Nguyen6-2, 6-4
2021-08-28Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Brian Board vs Mark Ball / Jevin West6-3, 6-2
2021-08-15Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesMichael Tammen / Josh Schweitz vs Brian Murphy / Rob Condiotty6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesStephen Robertson vs Julian Seneviratne3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-08-14Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesStephen Robertson vs Nick Moxley6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Tammen / Josh Schweitz vs Nathan Jones / Nick Jarvis6-3, 7-5
2021-08-14Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesStephen Robertson vs Marco Pineda6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Andrew Pritchard vs Connor Leahy / Gram Leahy6-4, 6-4
2021-07-18Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesStephen Robertson / Tanya O'Neil vs Kayleigh Tanca / Stefan Lagielski6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-18Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesShannon DeVall / Stephen Robertson vs Chotika Wannachinda / Alan Regala2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-17Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesMary Klinger / Josh Schweitz vs Daniel Armellino / Reanne Lee7-5, 7-6
2021-07-17Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Jennifer Simmons vs Todd Conley / Jazmin Ahyat6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-07-17Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesStephen Robertson / Stephanie Paulson vs Paul Suyumov / Samantha Haley6-1, 6-1
2021-07-17Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesStephen Robertson / Tanya O'Neil vs Stephanie Quan / Josh Basha6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-16Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesStephen Robertson / Stephanie Paulson vs Josh Pinyerd / Susan Shinoda6-0, 6-0
2021-07-16Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesStephen Robertson / Stephanie Paulson vs Michael Yee / June Wu6-2, 6-0
2021-05-17Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Nicholas Walrod vs Pim Trouerbach / Brenden Barrows6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDyllan Fitzgerald / Stephen Robertson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-24Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJosh Schweitz / Christopher Sackmann vs Eric Pickard / David Yahng6-4, 6-1
2021-04-18Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesKeith Meagher / Josh Schweitz vs Pim Trouerbach / Stefan Lagielski6-4, 6-4
2021-04-11Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesBrian Joelson / Stephen Robertson vs Seth Lee / Ben Talpos6-1, 6-3
2021-03-21Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDyllan Fitzgerald / Stephen Robertson vs Connor Picken / Adrien Leemin6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Tammen / Josh Schweitz vs Christopher Evola / James Luu7-6, 6-3
2021-03-07Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesStephen Robertson / Stephanie Paulson vs Dyllan Fitzgerald / Tatiana Bakhtina6-1, 6-2
2021-03-06Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesStephen Robertson / Stephanie Paulson vs June Wu / Michael Yee6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5.5
Stephen Robertson
74W–5L career · type S
not enough data
—
4.5
Josh Schweitz
58W–30L career
0%98%2%
4.24

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.