Teams

K.Rose

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-04vs B.Robinson 3.0 40Won 10
W#2 DoublesDEBRA LAUGHERY / Anne Redmond vs Ellen Zimmerman / Jennifer McFarling6-4, 6-3
2023-05-02vs C.George 40+Split 11
W#2 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Christa Hochstrasser vs Jaclyn Barker / Leigh Stallings7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana McNally / Lisa Austin vs Rebecca Anderson / Catherine George3-6, 2-6
2023-04-18vs J.TunWon 21
W#1 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Karen Rose vs Shirley Chapman / April Lyon6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Kelly Kelly vs Jennifer Tun / Marjorie Diaz6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelanie Lachance / DEBRA LAUGHERY vs Kelly Zargo / Kristin Brucker7-5, 7-5
2023-04-11vs D.MICHAUDLost 02
L#1 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Dana McNally vs Aparna Vanguri / Kristen Rauth3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDEBRA LAUGHERY / Anne Redmond vs Lisa Dooley / Debra Vaughn7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-28vs H.PflaumWon 10
W#2 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Melanie Lachance vs Heather Mills / Jennifer Troch6-1, 6-1
2023-03-21vs J.Copeland 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Melanie Lachance vs Theresa Critcher / Ashley Walker1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Dana McNally vs Leanne Stradling / Stephanie Suski6-2, 6-4
2023-03-14vs J.SolomonLost 01
L#1 DoublesDEBRA LAUGHERY / Amy Ellis vs Jennifer Kimball / Dana Earle6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Josette Huntress
published 3
2.88
Amy Ellis
published 3
2.79
Anne Redmond
published 3
2.65
McGavock Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Christa Hochstrasser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Catherine Chavez
published 3
2.52
Dana McNally
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
DEBRA LAUGHERY
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christa Hochstrasser + Dana McNally224 matchesnot enough data
Christa Hochstrasser + McGavock Edwards134 matchesnot enough data
Dana McNally + McGavock Edwards213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Josette Huntress
38W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Amy Ellis
17W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Anne Redmond
18W–26L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
McGavock Edwards
60W–88L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
2.65
3
Christa Hochstrasser
68W–118L career · 4 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Catherine Chavez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Dana McNally
32W–67L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
2.52
3
DEBRA LAUGHERY
48W–92L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.