Teams

M.Long3.0

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-02vs J.MitchellSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCari DeCandia / Karen Johnston vs Shayne Brodsgaard / Mary Strothmann6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJocelyn Quick / Kimberly Roberts vs Priscilla Nanney / Lavonne Moore6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2023-04-25vs J.Shuey 40+Split 11
W#1 SinglesKaren Johnston vs Amy Cagle6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKimberly Roberts / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs Rondi Furgason / Molly Clark2-6, 4-6
2023-04-18vs J.WOLBORSKY 3.0 40+Split 11
W#2 DoublesKaren Johnston / Cari DeCandia vs Carol Fielitz / Eliza Bobryshev6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDiane Allen / Jocelyn Quick vs Jill Dykes / Norma Wolcott1-6, 0-6
2023-04-11vs C.GraffWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary T Long / Karen Johnston vs Rebecca Roper / Pamela Alder6-3, 7-5
2023-03-28vs J.KaulbackLost 02
L#1 SinglesJocelyn Quick vs Jennifer Kaulback0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Johnston / Randi Rosen vs Rachel McLean / Kristen Levine0-6, 4-6
2023-03-21vs A.Uthe/JKerrLost 02
L#2 DoublesDiane Allen / Karen Johnston vs Ashley Gaylord / Elizabeth Merritt3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRandi Rosen / Jocelyn Quick vs Lee Veit / Julie Coyne3-6, 1-6
2023-03-14vs Z.Whitesell/KKnoblauchLost 02
L#2 DoublesKatie Elder / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs Nicole Masters / Zoe Whitesell1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKaren Johnston / Christine Stilley vs Mary Zimardo / Courtney Grinnell1-6, 0-6
2023-03-07vs A.WaltonLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiane Allen / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs Emma Coblentz / Amanda Viele5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Lisa Montague
published
3.59
Katie Elder
published
3.35
Cari DeCandia
published 3.5
3.33
Karen Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.90
Jocelyn Quick
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
published
2.65
Blake Ellis
published 3
2.51
Kimberly Roberts
published
2.35
Randi Rosen
published
2.29
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Elder + Lisa Montague123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Montague
25W–29L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
Katie Elder
36W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Cari DeCandia
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Karen Johnston
259W–106L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3
Jocelyn Quick
60W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
2.90
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Blake Ellis
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65
Kimberly Roberts
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%48%52%
2.51
Randi Rosen
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
111W–207L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.