Teams

SGV Queens of the Court- Vuong-Arroyo Seco/SA4

2026 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.82 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · SGV - Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SGV Creme de la Court-Kim-Flint CYN/SU2000000
2SGV Queens of the Court- Vuong-Arroyo Seco/SA4000000
3SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/SU12000000
4SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1000000
5SGV TCC- Johnson-Claremont Club/SU8000000
6SGV Terminetters- Bennett-Fremont Park/SA5000000
7SGV Fall Gummies-Manley-Arroyo HS/SU8000000
8SGV Lovers over Lobbers-Aye-San Dimas -SA1000000
9SGV Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA10000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Minnie Ingersoll
published 4
3.93
Katy Palfrey
published 4
3.83
Teresa Loveland
published 4
3.69
Deborah Babineau
published 4
3.69
Jean Kim
published
3.58
Rumduol Vuong
published 4
3.56
Milou Lee
published 3.5
3.54
Cristina Padron
published 3.5
3.54
May de Castro
published 4
3.52
India Mandelkern
published 4
3.48
Anita Tang
published 3.5
3.38
Sean Ky
published
3.21
Annemarie Schnedler
published 3.5
3.15
Makiko Sato
published
3.07
2.87
Felicia Yu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katy Palfrey + Rumduol Vuong5168% games+13.4% vs expected
Cristina Padron + May de Castro2449% games+10.7% vs expected
Rumduol Vuong + Deborah Babineau131648% games+2.1% vs expected
Anita Tang + Minnie Ingersoll7258% games+2.0% vs expected
Sean Ky + Anita Tang9557% games−3.5% vs expected
Milou Lee + Anita Tang9357% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Loveland + Rumduol Vuong4151% gamesnot enough data
Rumduol Vuong + Milou Lee3247% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Minnie Ingersoll
68W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
4.21
4
Katy Palfrey
61W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Teresa Loveland
94W–61L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Deborah Babineau
108W–119L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Jean Kim
30W–22L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Rumduol Vuong
57W–56L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Milou Lee
55W–32L career · no lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Cristina Padron
12W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
4
May de Castro
35W–81L career · type A · no lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.54
4
India Mandelkern
41W–40L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Anita Tang
70W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Sean Ky
27W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
3.5
Annemarie Schnedler
6W–13L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Makiko Sato
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Janna Conner-Niclaes
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
Felicia Yu
0W–9L career · no lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.