Teams

Atkins/Strauser

2022 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Nancy Atkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Kathleen Budnick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-08-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Atkins / Kathleen Budnick vs Molly Odonnell / Laura Rundle6-4, 6-4
2022-08-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesCorinne Strauser / Nancy Atkins vs Lori Bernhardt / Megan Meagher6-1, 6-4
2022-08-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Atkins / Kathleen Budnick vs Susie Jansky / Kim Hasle6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2022-07-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesCorinne Strauser / Nancy Atkins vs Angie Lee / Anna Lee6-0, 6-3
2022-07-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Corinne Strauser vs Kristin Spear / Teresa Sullivan6-2, 6-3
2022-07-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Nancy Atkins vs Terri Gotcher / June Kim4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-07-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Atkins / Kathleen Budnick vs Sherri Sacconaghi / Heather Dudley2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesCorinne Strauser / Nancy Atkins vs Molly Odonnell / Laura Rundle6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nancy Atkins
79W–82L career
38%62%0%
3.49
3.5
Kathleen Budnick
138W–170L career
0%98%2%
3.32

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.