Teams

Slay Belles

Fire & Ice 2025 - NA · Fire & Ice 3.0 Division

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-07vs ComadrAce Fire and IceWon 21
L#1 DoublesChelsea Mills / Monica Slaydon vs Amanda Alexander / Amanda Barto6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJackie Peck / Kelly McAlear vs Pamela Vinals / SELINA TREVINO6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Brown / Stephanie Hankins vs Gabriela Tawil / Andrea Gallegos6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-12-06vs Sleigh All DayWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Samson / Laurie Winters vs Claudia Odio / Maria Gonzalez6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJackie Peck / Kelly McAlear vs Holly Nelson / Melanie Hanssen6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesStephanie Hankins / Emily Brown vs Jackie Kemp / Danna Halff6-3, 6-1
2025-12-06vs Dominion GrinchesLost 03
L#1 DoublesNatalie Samson / Chelsea Mills vs Carmen Ahmed / Karla Soto5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Johnson / Johanna Suttle vs Blanca Nelly Rosales / Satchie Seidlits4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMonica Slaydon / Kelly McAlear vs Elena Camargo / Alex Echeverri5-7, 3-6
2025-12-06vs Ice PrincessesWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalie Samson / Chelsea Mills vs Kelsey Jones / Allie Anderson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMonica Slaydon / Stephanie Hankins vs Irma Trevino / Doreen Amft6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLaurie Winters / Emily Brown vs Lori Castellaw / Gina Jones6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-12-05vs Baby Got BackhandWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Johnson / Johanna Suttle vs Rhonda Claiborne / Ana Allegretti6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChelsea Mills / Laurie Winters vs Stephanie Heinrich / Victoria Fine6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Hankins / Emily Brown vs Rosalinda Rodriguez / Candace Chanler6-1, 6-1
2025-12-05vs Jell-O ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Johnson / Johanna Suttle vs FELISE de NOVO / Sara Rohan1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephanie Hankins / Kelly McAlear vs Anjelica Scott / Brittni Schuster6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Winters / Brittany Taylor vs Lydia Bederka / Ashley Metke6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fire & Ice 3.0 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Kelly McAlear
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Stephanie Hankins
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.07
Chelsea Mills
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.01
Natalie Samson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Monica Slaydon
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Jackie Peck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Johanna Suttle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Brittany Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Laurie Winters
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Slaydon + Natalie Samson6165% games+17.6% vs expected
Natalie Samson + Chelsea Mills5356% games+10.3% vs expected
Laurie Winters + Natalie Samson123 matchesnot enough data
Monica Slaydon + Chelsea Mills213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly McAlear
24W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Stephanie Hankins
59W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Chelsea Mills
29W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Natalie Samson
25W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Monica Slaydon
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Jackie Peck
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Johanna Suttle
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Brittany Taylor
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Winters
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.