Teams

LLW-CV-Rancho La Quinta/Girling

2023 SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Men's 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-11vs CV-Palm Desert Resort/TerharSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Medzegian / Charles Haugh vs Bryan Olson / Glen Stock6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMartin Rae / Kemp Buononato vs Roger Davis / BILL TERHAR6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2023-12-03vs CV-Palm Springs TC/DixonWon 20
W#1 DoublesCharles Haugh / Jeffrey Medzegian vs Edwin LIEW-FERGUSON / Danny Hitt6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBassem Boutros / Dennis Howey vs Kevin Stotts / DAVID YOUSE6-1, 6-0
2023-11-26vs CV-Indian Wells TG/GilesLost 01
L#2 DoublesBassem Boutros / Charles Haugh vs Randy Diamond / Tom Sloan3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-11-19vs CV-Mission Hills CC/KarnowskyWon 10
W#1 DoublesKemp Buononato / Charles Haugh vs Joe Daley / Paul Dudley6-2, 6-0
2023-10-29vs CV-Palm Springs TC/DixonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharles Haugh / Dennis Howey vs Dey Martin / Farshid Yadegar7-5, 6-2
2023-10-22vs CV-Indian Wells TG/GilesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCharles Haugh / Jeffrey Medzegian vs Paul Morton / Christopher Oliver6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDennis Howey / Dave Girling vs Randy Diamond / Tom Sloan4-6, 4-6
2023-10-15vs CV-Mission Hills CC/KarnowskyWon 20
W#1 DoublesKemp Buononato / Charles Haugh vs Roger Lujan / Mark Susskind6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMike Querrey / Martin Rae vs Daniel Karnowsky / Andrew Poulton7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jeffrey Medzegian
published
3.25
Dennis Howey
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Charles Haugh
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
Dave Girling
published 3.5
Don Gillen
published
Kemp Buononato
published
Martin Rae
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mike Querrey
published
Paul Ouimet
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Medzegian
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
3.5
Dennis Howey
32W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Charles Haugh
29W–20L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Dave Girling
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Don Gillen
10W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kemp Buononato
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Martin Rae
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Querrey
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paul Ouimet
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.