Teams

Bryson

2022 Harford Tri-Level 18 & Over · Harford Tri-Level 3.5,4.0,4.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-11-20vs StarnWon 10
W#2 DoublesGeri Riley / Natalie Bryson vs Bonnie Keating / Terri Mrozinski7-6, 6-3
2022-11-19vs StarnLost 01
L#1 DoublesMerve Gurlu / Geri Riley vs Natalie Bryson / Cathy Preisendorfer4-6, 3-6
2022-10-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesTracy Flaherty / Katie Wille vs Lynette Pinhey / Elena Torchia6-4, 6-3
2022-10-16vs StarnSplit 11
W#1 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / Maureen Martin vs Beverly Starn / Kyning Tillinghast6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLesley Tompkins / Geri Riley vs Terri Mrozinski / Bonnie Keating4-6, 4-6
2022-10-10vs StarnLost 01
L#1 DoublesMerve Gurlu / Geri Riley vs Laura Barwick / Alice Puckett3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-09vs StarnLost 02
L#1 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / Natalie Bryson vs Kim Fleming / Kyning Tillinghast1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGeri Riley / Lesley Tompkins vs Cathy Preisendorfer / Laura Barwick3-6, 3-6
2022-10-02vs StarnLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeri Riley / Melanie Goss vs Laura Barwick / Kate Dempsey1-6, 3-6
2022-10-01vs StarnLost 01
L#1 DoublesKarla Cachiaras / Geri Riley vs Cathy Preisendorfer / Natalie Bryson6-7, 2-6
2022-09-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesMerve Gurlu / Geri Riley vs Sharon OConnor / Natalie Bryson7-6, 7-6
2022-09-24vs FlemingWon 10
W#2 DoublesBonnie Thomas / Katie Wille vs Rebecca Pape / Marion Meyers6-4, 6-1
2022-09-21vs StarnWon 30
W#1 DoublesRosanne Murphy / Farzaneh Navid vs Kim Fleming / Beverly Starn1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoanne Holehouse / Geri Riley vs Karla Cachiaras / Laura Barwick6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTracy Flaherty / Katie Wille vs Beyza Akcam / Bonnie Thomas6-1, 6-2
2022-09-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Dolan / Katie Wille vs Tracy Flaherty / Stephanie Hutcheson7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Harford Tri-Level 3.5,4.0,4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Farzaneh Navid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.98
Rosanne Murphy
published
3.97
Natalie Bryson
published
3.97
Danielle Barry
published 4.5
3.79
Kathy Pettus
published
3.46
Geri Riley
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.45
Lesley Tompkins
published
3.38
Katie Wille
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Tracy Flaherty
published
Marina Hayden
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Farzaneh Navid
119W–111L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%25%75%
4.09
Rosanne Murphy
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.98
Natalie Bryson
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.97
4.5
Danielle Barry
9W–25L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.97
Kathy Pettus
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.79
4
Geri Riley
33W–80L career · 9 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
Lesley Tompkins
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Katie Wille
59W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
Tracy Flaherty
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Marina Hayden
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.