Teams

Taconic Sport & Racquet

2022 55&Over Men · 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-08-20vs Monroe Tennis ClubLost 01
L#2 DoublesNils Kenaston / Carlo Saenz vs Chris Franke / Richard Birgler5-7, 5-7
2022-08-14vs Monroe Tennis ClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesNils Kenaston / Carlo Saenz vs Tyler Etzel / David Baisley7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Joey Asher
published
3.37
Gary Davis
published 3.5
3.27
Rod Mano
published
Bobby Clarke
published 3.5
Dale Lois
published 3.5
3.22
Kent Charter
published
3.10
George Ciardi
published 3.5
2.94
Frank Miller
published 3
2.76
MICHAEL PEARLMAN
published
2.71
Carlo Saenz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Glenn Lois
published
Kyle VanKleeck
published
Nils Kenaston
published
Phil van Oss
published
Raimond Baumans
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rod Mano + Kent Charter10361% games+4.2% vs expected
Kent Charter + Gary Davis4151% games+2.4% vs expected
Kent Charter + George Ciardi5355% games+1.2% vs expected
Joey Asher + Gary Davis10263% games+1.2% vs expected
Phil van Oss + Gary Davis9263% games+0.1% vs expected
Phil van Oss + Joey Asher7359% games−5.3% vs expected
Kent Charter + Bobby Clarke4155% gamesnot enough data
Kyle VanKleeck + Joey Asher2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joey Asher
68W–29L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Gary Davis
94W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
Rod Mano
96W–66L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Bobby Clarke
15W–21L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dale Lois
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kent Charter
108W–107L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
George Ciardi
79W–54L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Frank Miller
16W–30L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
MICHAEL PEARLMAN
31W–49L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Carlo Saenz
53W–65L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Glenn Lois
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kyle VanKleeck
27W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nils Kenaston
36W–46L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Phil van Oss
22W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Raimond Baumans
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.