Teams

*4-KHolt-HS

2024 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-30vs *1-NWatts-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesDesiree Korelich / Carin von Kahr vs Kaitlin Keller / Gail Gardner6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShira Katsir / Catherine Quick vs Veda Gilbert / Jennie Dougherty6-1, 6-1
2024-04-26vs *2-APerry-HVCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Helms / Kathy Holt vs Ashley Perry / Anne Lucas6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCarin von Kahr vs Emily Bulkley2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-19vs *3-ACombs-CCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathy Holt / Desiree Korelich vs Angela Combs / Carolyn Krisko0-5
L#1 SinglesShira Katsir vs Liz Morris1-6, 4-6
2024-04-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Holt / Carin von Kahr vs Nicole Jackson / Isabella Goetting6-2, 6-1
2024-04-09vs *9-CGonzales-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Lockwood / Carin von Kahr vs Connie Hsu / Gabriela Stefan6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2024-04-07vs *6-LSchaller-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Holt / Kimberly Roberts vs Liz Schaller / Pamela Howell-Davis4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCarin von Kahr vs Cristina Raiti2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-03-24vs *7-SLussier-EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesShira Katsir vs Sophia Ewing6-2, 6-1
2024-03-03vs *5-SStowe-SVCWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnne Lockwood / Kathy Holt vs Elizabeth Misiti / Elizabeth Psaltis6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Draughon / Shira Katsir vs Katherine Zeph / Laura Malahias6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Shira Katsir
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.71
Carin von Kahr
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.67
Katie Helms
published
2.51
Kathy Holt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Kimberly Roberts
published
2.48
Desiree Korelich
published 2.5
2.39
Anne Lockwood
published 3
Jennifer Draughon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Holt + Carin von Kahr134 matchesnot enough data
Katie Helms + Carin von Kahr123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Shira Katsir
31W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Carin von Kahr
43W–63L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Katie Helms
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%11%89%
2.67
3
Kathy Holt
25W–62L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
Kimberly Roberts
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Desiree Korelich
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%54%46%
2.48
3
Anne Lockwood
0W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.39
Jennifer Draughon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.