Teams

Tiffin 6.5 Combo ‘26

2026 Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Adult 55 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-03vs Beattie-ShoalsWon 20
W#1 DoublesSherri Henderson / Janet Hester vs Donna Garner / Debbie Peak5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Brazeale / Kathy Conner vs Rebecca Hall / Pamela Prax6-3, 7-6
2026-08-28vs Beattie-ShoalsLost 12
W#1 DoublesSherri Henderson / Janet Hester vs Carol Baron / Debbie Haythorn6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRhonda Lash / Kenda Rusevlyan vs Amy Garrett / Melinda Sevier3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTerri Self / Roxane Grimes vs Lee Renfroe / Beth Fennel3-6, 1-4
2026-08-27vs Beattie-ShoalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa Martin / Mary Ann Whitlock vs Amy Garrett / Melinda Sevier2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Brocato / Amanda Gooch vs Beth Fennel / Debbie Haythorn2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathy Conner / Jill Brazeale vs Dina Beattie / Rebecca Hall3-6, 4-6
2026-08-18vs Beattie-ShoalsLost 12
W#1 DoublesRhonda Lash / Kenda Rusevlyan vs Melinda Sevier / Debbie Peak6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Whitlock / Kathy Conner vs Debbie Haythorn / Carol Baron1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Hester / Sherri Henderson vs Lee Renfroe / Beth Fennel6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-13vs Beattie-ShoalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Tiede / Elaine Vaughn vs Carol Baron / Donna Garner2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Self / Roxane Grimes vs Lee Renfroe / Beth Fennel4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Brocato / Sherri Henderson vs Amy Garrett / Melinda Sevier0-6, 2-6
2026-08-03vs Beattie-ShoalsLost 12
W#1 DoublesJill Brazeale / Amanda Gooch vs Amy Garrett / Debbie Haythorn6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJanet Hester / Teresa Martin vs Lee Renfroe / Beth Fennel4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Conner / Roxane Grimes vs Carol Baron / Donna Garner0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Adult 55 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Beattie-Shoals2051235
2Tiffin 6.5 Combo ‘2602151067

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Mary Ann Whitlock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Janet Hester
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Roxane Grimes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Jill Brazeale
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Sherri Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Elaine Vaughn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Lori Tiede
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Amanda Gooch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Susan Brocato
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Teresa Martin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Jeanne Self
published
2.75
Kenda Rusevlyan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Michelle Tiffin
published
2.45
Terri Self
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rhonda Lash
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Brazeale + Michelle Tiffin7259% games+17.0% vs expected
Jill Brazeale + Amanda Gooch8161% games+5.4% vs expected
Elaine Vaughn + Jeanne Self111250% games+5.1% vs expected
Sherri Henderson + Amanda Gooch14952% games−6.9% vs expected
Elaine Vaughn + Michelle Tiffin224 matchesnot enough data
Sherri Henderson + Susan Brocato314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ann Whitlock + Susan Brocato314 matchesnot enough data
Kenda Rusevlyan + Lori Tiede123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Ann Whitlock
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Janet Hester
21W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Roxane Grimes
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.96
Jill Brazeale
21W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
Sherri Henderson
40W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.90
Elaine Vaughn
27W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.87
Lori Tiede
18W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Amanda Gooch
39W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Susan Brocato
30W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Teresa Martin
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.78
Jeanne Self
19W–29L career · no lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.75
Kenda Rusevlyan
37W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Michelle Tiffin
18W–15L career · no lines in 2026
0%25%75%
2.59
Terri Self
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
Rhonda Lash
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.