Teams

LJBA-Banner/Peninsula 18+ Men's 8.5

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 8.5 Men Wed PM 18s

11 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-26vs LVSA-Sampoornam/BaileyWon 21
W#1 DoublesLouis Foreman / Josh Goldblatt vs Kyle Le / Vaughn Schmutz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBill Moore / Todd Moyer vs Prakhar Paharia / Carl Yerger6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJames Banner / Ryan Whalen vs Hayden Tuttle / Jackson Suber2-6, 4-6
2026-08-12vs LKHA-Haynes/CSD 18+ 8.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesBrett Scherrman / David Stroman vs Steven Kayton / Thomas Andrews3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLouis Foreman / Josh Goldblatt vs Miguel Monguilod / Michael Dedmond7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDerrick Sink / Paul Simeon vs Eric Hayes / Adam Labar6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men Wed PM 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Josh Goldblatt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.01
Derrick Sink
published 4.5
3.95
Chris Wixom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.93
Todd Moyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Louis Foreman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Bill Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Alfu Miah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Kurt Thielemann
published
3.65
Brett Scherrman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Ryan Whalen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Paul Simeon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louis Foreman + Bill Moore7361% games+7.0% vs expected
Alfu Miah + Louis Foreman6260% games+4.9% vs expected
Chris Wixom + Louis Foreman40767% games+3.0% vs expected
Alfu Miah + Bill Moore5645% games+1.4% vs expected
Brett Scherrman + Bill Moore241156% games−5.3% vs expected
Brett Scherrman + Alfu Miah2744% gamesnot enough data
Brett Scherrman + Louis Foreman4545% gamesnot enough data
Brett Scherrman + Chris Wixom4253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Josh Goldblatt
150W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Derrick Sink
7W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
Chris Wixom
107W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Todd Moyer
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.93
4
Louis Foreman
266W–113L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Bill Moore
131W–92L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Alfu Miah
103W–107L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Kurt Thielemann
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Brett Scherrman
116W–114L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
Ryan Whalen
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.62
4
Paul Simeon
32W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.