Teams

Not My Fault

2023 USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 3.45 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-04-16vs Biscuits with the BossLost 01
L#3 DoublesWilliam Merrick / Kelly Haskell vs Sandra Gulley / Rick Stoddard3-6, 3-6
2023-04-15vs Group TherapyLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori van Alfen / Ryan van Alfen vs Erin Kohler / Darron Peterson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Haskell / Greg Haskell vs Chadd Cripe / Kimberly Stewart4-6, 1-6
2023-03-31vs Dominetters 2.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesShelley Hunter / William Merrick vs Maji Daines / Mike Cooley4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLori van Alfen / Ryan van Alfen vs Elba Massena / Mark Smith3-6, 6-7
2023-03-25vs MSA (Mas Serve Aces)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesShelley Hunter / William Merrick vs Jared Stein / Jennifer Wilson6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori van Alfen / Ryan van Alfen vs Alan Day / Suzie Wilson7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2023-03-24vs Guys & Dolls w/BallsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori van Alfen / Ryan van Alfen vs Kristen Gray / Steve Gray5-6
W#2 DoublesShelley Hunter / William Merrick vs Mardianne Howell / Randy Howell7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKelly Haskell / Greg Haskell vs Rebecca Swanson / Craig Roth4-6, 2-6
2023-03-12vs Have FunLost 01
L#3 DoublesKelly Haskell / Greg Haskell vs Bill Fritz / Lisa della Badia7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-11vs Idaho/Lim/18&Over7.0XSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGreg Haskell / Kelly Haskell vs Troy Casper / Nancy Mallory5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Merrick / Shelley Hunter vs Gary Lim / Brenda Bourn0-1
2023-03-05vs Mixed ReactionsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Haskell / Greg Haskell vs Amy Wendel / Steven Garcia2-6, 0-6
2023-03-04vs One Hit WondersWon 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Merrick / Shelley Hunter vs Steve Hoffman / Alexandra Owens6-2, 6-1
2023-02-25vs UntouchaballsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Haskell / Greg Haskell vs Molly Henrie / Alex Henrie1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShelley Hunter / Owen Hammond vs Andrea Reynolds / Eric Hallingstad2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Mary Parsons
published 4
3.73
Kimberly Cowley
published 4
3.64
Shelley Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Dawn Crochet
published 3.5
3.35
Chris Culig
published 3.5
3.35
Kristina Kingery
published 3.5
Greg Haskell
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Lee Parsons
published 3
3.21
Dan Hart
published 3.5
3.21
William Merrick
published 3.5
2.83
Jamie Hammond
published 3
2.80
Leah Hart
published
2.62
Owen Hammond
published 3
Kelly Haskell
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Lori van Alfen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ryan van Alfen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Parsons + Lee Parsons192250% games−5.4% vs expected
Chris Culig + Dawn Crochet152246% games−7.7% vs expected
Mary Parsons + Owen Hammond1939% games−9.1% vs expected
Dan Hart + Leah Hart82541% games−19.2% vs expected
Greg Haskell + Kelly Haskell21636% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Hunter + William Merrick12459% gamesnot enough data
Lori van Alfen + Ryan van Alfen6547% gamesnot enough data
Jamie Hammond + Owen Hammond1835% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Parsons
169W–125L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Kimberly Cowley
140W–95L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Shelley Hunter
96W–100L career · 6 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Dawn Crochet
170W–181L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Chris Culig
106W–89L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Kristina Kingery
54W–65L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Greg Haskell
50W–77L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Lee Parsons
64W–75L career · no lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.24
3.5
Dan Hart
112W–142L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
William Merrick
83W–58L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Jamie Hammond
31W–57L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.83
Leah Hart
52W–93L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
2.80
3
Owen Hammond
37W–56L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.62
Kelly Haskell
78W–129L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori van Alfen
51W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryan van Alfen
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.