Teams

Jamison/Nashville

2025 Adult 55 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women - Saturday AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-26vs Freeland/Bright/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Jacobs / Beverly Pearson vs Angela Robbins / Trudy Sullivan6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJudy Philpot / Jan Rutherford vs Julie May / Wendy Baker3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDebbie Williams / Susan Severn vs Glenda Anderson / Elaine Lee1-6, 3-6
2025-04-19vs Bailey/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Jamison / Laura Newport vs Mary Ball / Carolyn Duncan6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJudy Philpot / Susan Severn vs Mimi Hayati / Cindy Cunningham6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRhee Lotito / Karen Leddy vs Mary Smith / Shirley Brennan2-6, 3-6
2025-04-13vs Pulley/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebbie Jacobs / Jan Rutherford vs Joni Jestings / Karen Vasil2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBeverly Pearson / Ida Johnson vs Jeanne Ludington / Jeannie Tapley4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Newport / Carol Jamison vs Patricia Evans / Janet McMeen6-2, 6-4
2025-04-05vs Freeland/Bright/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKay Rose / Beverly Pearson vs Peggy Rosenblatt / Nell Adams1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Williams / Susan Severn vs Laurie Farris / Elaine Lee1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKaren Leddy / Rhee Lotito vs Wendy Baker / Kim West0-6, 1-6
2025-03-29vs Bailey/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesFrances Hogue / Ida Johnson vs Annette Crocker / Beth Stromatt3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Jacobs / Jan Rutherford vs Shirley Brennan / Mary Smith6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarcy Jacobs / Laura Newport vs Nancy Bailey / Gloria Johnson6-0, 6-0
2025-03-01vs Pulley/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Jamison / Judy Philpot vs Karen Vasil / Amy Hirt1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Williams / Susan Severn vs Janet McMeen / Brenda Mudter3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Newport / Marcy Jacobs vs Jenny Barnes / Jeannie Tapley4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Saturday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Laura Newport
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Carol Jamison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Beverly Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Debbie Jacobs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Debbie Williams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Ida Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
Susan Severn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Frances Hogue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jan Rutherford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Judy Philpot
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kay Rose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marcy Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rhee Lotito
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Jamison + Laura Newport314 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Williams + Susan Severn033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Newport
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Carol Jamison
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Beverly Pearson
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Debbie Jacobs
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Debbie Williams
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ida Johnson
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.70
Susan Severn
9W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Frances Hogue
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jan Rutherford
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Judy Philpot
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kay Rose
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marcy Jacobs
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhee Lotito
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.