Teams

OC Heritage Park Irvine- Nancy Sun1pm

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - OC WE · OC Women WE - 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#2 DoublesJannah Carrasco / Ryann Taeger vs Susan Tibbetts / Connie Wolfe3-6, 2-6
2023-04-02vs OC LLW ElDorado - Susie KimLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Carpenter / Jannah Carrasco vs Karla Padova / Katie Gwiner2-6, 3-6
2023-03-12vs OC Heritage Park- Sharon -Sun1pmLost 01
L#2 DoublesRyann Taeger / Jannah Carrasco vs Mary Goff / Elizabeth Sanders6-7, 4-6
2023-03-05vs OC Team Courage -LPC - Nisha Sat1Won 10
W#3 DoublesJannah Carrasco / Cindy Carpenter vs Susan Tan / Isabelle Krenz6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Carpenter / Jannah Carrasco vs Cindy Chau / Tammy Vuong7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2023-01-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Marcosa / Jannah Carrasco vs Annie Huang / Coco Wang6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-22vs OC Heritage Park- Sharon -Sun1pmWon 10
W#3 DoublesJannah Carrasco / Ryann Taeger vs Sharon Diekneit / Maria des Dorides6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Patricia Santiago
published
3.35
Karen Brink
published
3.33
Jannah Carrasco
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.22
Trisha Seminoff
published
3.17
Alicia Callanan
published 3.5
3.17
Ryann Taeger
published
3.01
Tanya Weinheimer
published
2.95
Nancy Marcosa
published
2.67
Cindy Carpenter
published 3
Jesse Ellison
published
Megan Caporicci
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Carpenter + Nancy Marcosa2449% games+2.5% vs expected
Alicia Callanan + Trisha Seminoff3543% games−3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Santiago
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Karen Brink
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Jannah Carrasco
84W–81L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
Trisha Seminoff
13W–19L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Alicia Callanan
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Ryann Taeger
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.17
Tanya Weinheimer
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Nancy Marcosa
11W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Cindy Carpenter
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
Jesse Ellison
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Caporicci
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.