Teams

De.John18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-08vs Ch.Higgins18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesKeisha Price / Deno Fonville vs Nannette Goodwin / Nancy Pack3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-10-01vs Ta.Parise18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesDeno Fonville / Monique Jiggetts vs Elizabeth Copeland / Emily Culbreth1-6, 1-6
2023-09-25vs Mi.Then18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesKeisha Price / Deno Fonville vs Stacy Rank / Lorraine Bowen2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAshley McRae / Monique Jiggetts vs Judith Stewart / Jordan Fieldstein3-6, 1-6
2023-09-24vs Li.Ihly18C8.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDeno Fonville / Ashley McRae vs Colleen Brown / Courtney Whalen6-7, 3-6
2023-09-03vs Ch.Higgins18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesQUEEN HARGROVE / Ashley McRae vs Danielle Rowe / Amber Cagle3-6, 2-6
2023-08-27vs Ta.Parise18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeno Fonville / Christine Letcher vs Elizabeth Copeland / Emily Culbreth2-6, 5-7
2023-08-20vs Li.Ihly18C8.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley McRae / Deno Fonville vs Colleen Brown / Aileen Carroll5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesQUEEN HARGROVE / Christine Letcher vs Lisa Ihly / Nikki DAmbrose2-6, 1-6
2023-08-13vs Mi.Then18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeno Fonville / Keisha Price vs Leigh Mullins / Claire Songkakul2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesQUEEN HARGROVE / Paulina Powierza vs Lorraine Bowen / Judith Stewart4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Paulina Powierza
published
3.81
Deno Fonville
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.48
Ashley McRae
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
3.08
Kimberly McClain
published
2.66
QUEEN HARGROVE
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

QUEEN HARGROVE + Ashley McRae91346% games−5.5% vs expected
Deno Fonville + QUEEN HARGROVE2740% gamesnot enough data
Deno Fonville + Ashley McRae2544% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paulina Powierza
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Deno Fonville
132W–132L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
3.5
Ashley McRae
164W–154L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
Mary Marshall Easley
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
Kimberly McClain
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
QUEEN HARGROVE
107W–205L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.