Teams

Br.Robinson18A3.0

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-15vs Co.Haynes18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaige Boyles / Erika Plant vs Erin Hemminger / Merab Puleo6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Glendy / Marilyn Gordian vs Tina Dahir / Michele Lagerstedt6-2, 6-4
2024-05-15vs Kr.Levine18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrittany Robinson / Alexa Spain vs Laurie Holderness / Beth Farrell6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-28vs Me.Gill18ALost 01
L#2 SinglesBrittany Robinson vs Julia Bethune1-6, 2-6
2024-04-07vs Ju.Andrews18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesPaige Boyles / Rebecca Glendy vs Meghan Paris / Melissa Burke2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBrittany Robinson / Alexa Spain vs Margaret Eller / Anna Goodmon6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-03-17vs La.Kane18AWon 10
W#3 DoublesJenny Sweet / Marilyn Gordian vs Mary T Long / Katie Taylor6-3, 6-2
2024-03-10vs Je.Sagal Solomon18ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesEllen Zimmerman / Marilyn Gordian vs Christy van Ness / McGavock Edwards4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesErika Plant vs Jill Wolborsky6-1, 6-1
2024-03-03vs Ma.Cambo18ALost 01
L#3 DoublesBrittany Robinson / Paige Boyles vs Kelsey Brandt / Sam Fouser3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Emily Rubin
published 3
Donna Hovis
published 3
2.72
Jessica McGinnis
published
2.70
Marilyn Gordian
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.62
Paige Boyles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Stephanie Gillespie
published
2.58
Jennifer McFarling
published
2.49
Erika Plant
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.38
Rebecca Glendy
published
2.19
Jenny Sweet
published
2.15
Brittany Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Plant + Brittany Robinson9553% gamesnot enough data
Paige Boyles + Brittany Robinson2741% gamesnot enough data
Erika Plant + Paige Boyles213 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer McFarling + Stephanie Gillespie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emily Rubin
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.10
3
Donna Hovis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jessica McGinnis
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Marilyn Gordian
81W–48L career · 7 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Paige Boyles
46W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
Stephanie Gillespie
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
Jennifer McFarling
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Erika Plant
44W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.49
Rebecca Glendy
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.38
Jenny Sweet
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Brittany Robinson
78W–99L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.