Teams

Skyview David/Meek

2025 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult Women 55 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-04-12vs FK WalshWon 10
W#2 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Tracy Shisler vs Deborah Borge-Shaffer / Carol Mecca6-2, 6-1
2025-04-05vs Villages DavisWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracy Shisler / Irma Buttermore vs Lisa Lee / Margaret Mis6-4, 7-6
2025-03-22vs FK Paris - BarletLost 01
L#3 DoublesTracy Shisler / Irma Buttermore vs Beatrice Barlet / Julie Haynes1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-15vs Legrone - BrownLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracy Shisler / Irma Buttermore vs Cindy Barnard / Tina Thomas4-6, 2-6
2025-03-08vs Marion/Copeland/55&Over7.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Tracy Shisler vs Maricel Keiter / Terry Sturm7-6, 6-3
2025-03-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Helen Sweeney vs Linda Johnson / Janet Mulligan6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-22vs FK WalshWon 10
W#3 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce vs Rhonda Sangster / Marianne Zitnick7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-15vs Villages DavisLost 01
L#3 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Petrea Coleman vs Robin Zink / Mary Meek7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-02vs Skyview Aces - PrittWon 10
W#1 DoublesHelen Sweeney / Irma Buttermore vs Briget Brothers / Linda Johnson6-3, 6-3
2025-01-25vs Legrone - BrownWon 10
W#2 DoublesIrma Buttermore / Tracy Shisler vs Lorraine Hollweg / Susan Felten6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Helen Sweeney
published 4
3.24
Irma Buttermore
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.02
Judy Weber
published
2.97
Henny David
published 3.5
Petrea Coleman
published
Rita Meek
published
Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tana Hubbard
published
Tracy Shisler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Henny David + Tana Hubbard134 matchesnot enough data
Irma Buttermore + Rita Meek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Helen Sweeney
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Irma Buttermore
86W–80L career · 10 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Judy Weber
0W–12L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.02
3.5
Henny David
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Petrea Coleman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rita Meek
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tana Hubbard
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Shisler
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.