Teams

GTC-Kelly/Pinyerd

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-17Won 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Rosati / Joseph Rehberger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCasey Moore / Tim Atkinson vs James Crawford / Jim Oliver6-2, 6-1
2022-06-04Won 20
W#1 DoublesChristian Anderson / Alasdair Graham vs JIM HENDERSON / James Crawford6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTim Atkinson / Robert Michaels vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-29vs TLTC-Henderson/DugganSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTim Atkinson / Phu Quoc Huynh vs Jeremy Martinson / Gary Rose1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJoseph Rehberger vs Jacob Strobl6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-15vs TLTC-Henderson/DugganSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTim Atkinson vs Gary Rose3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesChristian Anderson / Joseph Rehberger vs Charles Lake / Jim Oliver6-2, 6-2
2022-05-07vs TLTC-Henderson/DugganLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Rosati / Alasdair Graham vs Larry Gezelius / Jacob Strobl0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJoseph Rehberger vs Ryan Mello6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChristian Anderson / Phu Quoc Huynh vs Jim Oliver / Matt Zehnder4-6, 1-6
2022-04-24vs TLTC-Henderson/DugganLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlasdair Graham / Phu Quoc Huynh vs Ryan Mello / Larry Gezelius0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristian Anderson / Robert Michaels vs Charles Lake / Gary Rose6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-16vs TLTC-Henderson/DugganWon 21
L#1 DoublesCasey Moore / Tim Atkinson vs Nick Barr / Jacob Strobl4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesChristian Anderson vs Larry Gezelius6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlasdair Graham / Joseph Rehberger vs JIM HENDERSON / Ken Levey6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TLTC-Henderson/Duggan3310817142
2GTC-Kelly/Pinyerd3381021147

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Shane Cropper
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.12
Christian Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.92
Joseph Rehberger
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
Alasdair Graham
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Robert Michaels
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Atkinson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 0
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Shane Cropper
7W–14L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Christian Anderson
52W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Joseph Rehberger
24W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
2.92
2.5
Alasdair Graham
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Michaels
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
0
Tim Atkinson
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.