Teams

Thomas, Dina

2026 Combo 40 & Over-JXN · Women 8.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs Coffey, CeliaLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Mooney / Angie DeLeon vs Lisa Jeffcoat / Melissa K Beach2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Holt / Libby Jones vs Amanda Mincey / Elizabeth MacPherson4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Howard / Dina Thomas vs Vanessa Wilson / Becky Pardue6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-20vs Rector, StacieLost 03
L#1 DoublesDina Thomas / Kelly Howard vs Daphne Bilbrew / Emily Harper5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesGretchen Ware / Mary Taylor vs Tracy Mason / Jayme Griffin4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary Beth Cantrell / Nicole Buchanan vs Ellen Warren / Miles Munn1-6, 3-6
2026-08-06vs Coffey, CeliaLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Mooney / Carrie Eaton vs Lisa Jeffcoat / Lauree Davis5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesStephanie Holt / Nicole Buchanan vs Kimberly Harrell / Amy Slade0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Howard / Angie DeLeon vs Leslie Ledoux / Becky Pardue6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 8.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Coffey, Celia1030123
2Otto, Jen0103636
3Thomas, Dina0103635

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Stephanie Holt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Angie DeLeon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Kelly Howard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Gretchen Ware
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Michele Rumbley
published
3.40
Carrie Eaton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.23
Mary Beth Cantrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Dina Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nicole Buchanan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Rumbley + Angie DeLeon8559% games+3.6% vs expected
Gretchen Ware + Mary Beth Cantrell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Holt
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Angie DeLeon
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Kelly Howard
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.56
Gretchen Ware
22W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Michele Rumbley
23W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
4
Carrie Eaton
21W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.40
Mary Beth Cantrell
31W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Dina Thomas
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicole Buchanan
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.