Teams

Cousar/Memphis

2024 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 2.5 Women 18 & over

10 players · average NTRP 2.62 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-27vs Tamboli/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesKIMBERLY JUSSELY / Clare Moffit vs Mollie Tamboli / Marjorie Porter0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHolly Cousar vs Olivia House2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary-Grace Gentry / Molly Holladay vs Megan Arthur / Francie Sentilles6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-03-30vs Meagle/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesHolly Cousar / Allison Jones vs Jenay Boggs / Natalie Meagle7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTracy Lombardo vs Lexis Zellner3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKIMBERLY JUSSELY / Kristi Crawford vs Julia McDonald / Rachel Young0-5
2024-03-23vs Webb/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary-Grace Gentry / KIMBERLY JUSSELY vs Blake Adams / Katie Gronostaj0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAllison Jones vs Shannon Boyd6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesClare Moffit / Dorian Abston vs Jessica Arth / Amanda Whittington1-6, 3-6
2024-03-16vs Daly/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesJenni Harris / Tracy Lombardo vs Angela Finerson / Anne Jordan3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesShalisa Pritchard / Dorian Abston vs Francesca Bengert / Francis Mcrae0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Allison Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.59
Holly Cousar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.39
Mary-Grace Gentry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.28
Jenni Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Dorian Abston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Tracy Lombardo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.11
Clare Moffit
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.01
KIMBERLY JUSSELY
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Molly Holladay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shalisa Pritchard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Cousar + KIMBERLY JUSSELY303 matchesnot enough data
Jenni Harris + Tracy Lombardo123 matchesnot enough data
Mary-Grace Gentry + KIMBERLY JUSSELY123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Jones
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
2.5
Holly Cousar
15W–9L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
0%25%75%
2.59
Mary-Grace Gentry
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%81%19%
2.39
Jenni Harris
14W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Dorian Abston
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracy Lombardo
14W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Clare Moffit
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.11
KIMBERLY JUSSELY
14W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Molly Holladay
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Shalisa Pritchard
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.