Teams

JIngram (Veterans Park)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Thurs PM

8 players · average NTRP 4.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-08Split 11
L#2 DoublesJared Ingram / Chris Franc vs Ramesh Thyagarajan / Ricky Marks5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHenry Harborne / Fred Murchison vs Kirk Olsen / Hector Tovar6-1, 6-1
2023-05-04Won 20
W#2 DoublesJared Ingram / Joshua Stone vs Rudy Bombien / Patrick Kartes6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLogan Wilson / Fred Murchison vs David Bentley / Michal Jarzynski7-5, 6-2
2023-04-20Won 10
W#1 SinglesJared Ingram vs Gabriel Everett6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-13vs DDeMaine/RVojjini (Queens)Split 11
W#1 SinglesJared Ingram vs Evan Koch6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLogan Wilson / Anthony Bertucci vs Rakesh Kumar Vojjini / Alex Giardina2-6, 3-6
2023-04-06Split 11
W#1 DoublesJared Ingram / Anthony Bertucci vs Brett Diller / Martin Iles7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesFred Murchison vs Frank Masucci6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2023-03-16Won 10
W#2 SinglesJared Ingram vs Anthony Roe6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-03-09vs RBombien (Mountainbrook)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJared Ingram / Hunter Moore vs Matthew Alexander / Ben Senn7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesFred Murchison / Tap Perry vs Patrick Blandford / Thomas Dukes6-7, 1-6
2023-03-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesJared Ingram vs Andrew Hocek6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Hunter Moore
published 4.5
4.11
Jared Ingram
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.04
Keegan Merck
published
3.92
Alex Carver
published 4
3.83
Henry Harborne
published 4
3.83
Chris Franc
published 4
3.52
Fred Murchison
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.39
Anthony Bertucci
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keegan Merck + Alex Carver2440% games−9.9% vs expected
Jared Ingram + Anthony Bertucci3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hunter Moore
74W–43L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Jared Ingram
102W–53L career · 8 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
Keegan Merck
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Alex Carver
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Henry Harborne
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Chris Franc
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Fred Murchison
29W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Anthony Bertucci
53W–41L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.