Teams

SFV - LLW-The 300's 8.0 55 /Argana

2025 Adult 55 SFV Spring · SFV 55 & Over - Men 8.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-07-26vs SFV - Jurassic Lakers/ThielstromWon 20
W#1 DoublesShane Duffy / Jimmy Lee vs Bret Hofstein / Christopher Goodman6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPhillip Nguyen / Steve Oetomo vs Cortes Alexander / Jason Resnick6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 55 & Over - Men 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Daniel Nolan
published 4.5
4.12
Jaime Barajas
published
3.98
Chad Fenwick
published 4
3.97
Sunny Trinh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.87
Marvin Schmidt
published
3.83
Shane Duffy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Eric Schaefer
published
3.81
Shimon Nofar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Mark Lipsky
published
3.76
William Landrum
published
3.68
Keith Guinn
published
3.67
Steve Oetomo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Peter Heinbecker
published
3.42
Brad Bixel
published 3.5
Aldo Argana
published 3.5
Eric Book
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gary Weinzimer
published
Kent Goss
published
Peter Schuster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Landrum + Eric Schaefer4250% games−12.9% vs expected
Chad Fenwick + Eric Schaefer5067% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Nolan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
Jaime Barajas
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
4.12
4
Chad Fenwick
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
4.5
Sunny Trinh
146W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
Marvin Schmidt
35W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Shane Duffy
25W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Eric Schaefer
20W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Shimon Nofar
217W–98L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Mark Lipsky
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
William Landrum
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Keith Guinn
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Steve Oetomo
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Peter Heinbecker
6W–18L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
3.5
Brad Bixel
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Aldo Argana
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Eric Book
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gary Weinzimer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kent Goss
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Schuster
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.