Teams

TOC.Yang

2025 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesYi Chen / Chaitawat Sirisereewan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-13vs TING.TandonLost 01
L#1 DoublesChaitawat Sirisereewan / Tianren Zhou vs Karan Mehra / Rajeev Bhogadi1-6, 6-7
2025-09-21vs MCP.RatliffWon 10
W#1 DoublesYi Chen / Chaitawat Sirisereewan vs Francisco Burbano / James Stiegler6-3, 6-2
2025-09-14vs TING.ByrdWon 10
W#3 DoublesChaitawat Sirisereewan / Tianren Zhou vs Alex Thomason / Jeff Heinz6-0, 6-1
2025-09-07vs TOC.KleinWon 10
W#1 DoublesChaitawat Sirisereewan / Yi Chen vs Chip Pope / Richard Klein6-2, 6-2
2025-08-24vs TOC.XiaoWon 10
W#1 DoublesChaitawat Sirisereewan / Yuxu Yang vs Trey Morris / Wayne Xiao7-5, 6-2
2025-08-17vs MCP.RatliffWon 10
W#1 DoublesChaitawat Sirisereewan / Jeff Rauber vs Patrick Polhemus / Bill Coleman6-4, 7-5
2025-08-10vs TING.ByrdWon 10
W#1 DoublesChaitawat Sirisereewan / Yi Chen vs Srivatsan Ramesh / Stacy Bowden6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Chaitawat Sirisereewan
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 3.5
3.60
Leon LI
published
3.42
Qi Zhang
published
3.42
Bokang Zhou
published 3
3.06
Jeff Rauber
published
3.06
Tianren Zhou
published
3.03
Kevin Zheng
published
2.98
Yuxu Yang
published
XINGZHOU LI
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chaitawat Sirisereewan + Leon LI213 matchesnot enough data
Chaitawat Sirisereewan + Tianren Zhou213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chaitawat Sirisereewan
43W–11L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
Leon LI
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Qi Zhang
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3
Bokang Zhou
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Jeff Rauber
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Tianren Zhou
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.06
Kevin Zheng
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.03
Yuxu Yang
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
XINGZHOU LI
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.