Teams

Sparr

2022 St Marys Tri-Level · St Marys Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-09-13vs PhungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrandie Sparr / Susan Maier vs Marissa Romanek / Lilli Altenburg4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSabra Szczyglowski / Kristina Lebron vs Rosalie Hooper / Lori Romanek6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-10vs PhungLost 01
L#2 DoublesMegan Gladwell / Kristina Lebron vs Lori Romanek / Nhi Phung4-6, 6-7
2022-09-07vs PhungWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrandie Sparr / Susan Maier vs Lilli Altenburg / Kristen Staley5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Gladwell / Maria Birnkammer vs Jennifer Arthur / Nhi Phung6-1, 6-4
2022-09-06vs PhungLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrandie Sparr / Lisa Thompson vs Diana Heinze / Marissa Romanek6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Gladwell / Kristina Lebron vs Jennifer Arthur / Nhi Phung6-7, 4-6
2022-08-31vs PhungLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Kristina Lebron vs Jennifer Arthur / Lori Romanek3-6, 6-7
2022-08-30vs PhungLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Sabra Szczyglowski vs Jennifer Arthur / Nhi Phung6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2022-08-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrandie Sparr / Susan Maier vs Carrie Anderson / Kristen Staley3-6, 6-7
2022-08-24vs PhungLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrandie Sparr / Lisa Thompson vs Marissa Romanek / Kristen Staley4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Kristina Lebron vs Lori Romanek / Nhi Phung1-6, 4-6
2022-08-23vs PhungSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrandie Sparr / LISA GRIMES vs Marissa Romanek / Carrie Anderson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaria Birnkammer / Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins vs Rosalie Hooper / Nhi Phung1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for St Marys Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Brandie Sparr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Susan Maier
published
3.53
LISA GRIMES
published
3.50
Megan Gladwell
published
3.42
Maria Birnkammer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Kristina Lebron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
2.93
Sabra Szczyglowski
published
2.73
Karen Adriani
published
Jena Carrington
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Maier + LISA GRIMES4158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandie Sparr
104W–102L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Susan Maier
14W–3L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
LISA GRIMES
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
Megan Gladwell
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Maria Birnkammer
97W–141L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Kristina Lebron
63W–53L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Sabra Szczyglowski
32W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
2.93
Karen Adriani
0W–11L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
2.73
Jena Carrington
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.