Teams

OMalley

2023 USTA League Adult 55 & Over - Spring - HSV · 4.0 Men 55N3D

11 players · average NTRP 3.64 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Men 55N3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
DANIEL FRITH
published 4
3.43
Pascal Auburtin
published
3.30
Blake Herrin
published 3.5
3.28
Akram Haggag
published 4
David Walker
published 3.5
3.25
Tom Estes
published
3.24
David Argenti
published 3.5
3.22
Eduardo DelaPaz
published 3.5
3.21
Michael Rogers
published
3.16
Edward O'Malley
published 3.5
Raymond Shaughnessy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Argenti + Edward O'Malley224 matchesnot enough data
Tom Estes + Edward O'Malley404 matchesnot enough data
Eduardo DelaPaz + Blake Herrin213 matchesnot enough data
Eduardo DelaPaz + Edward O'Malley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
DANIEL FRITH
66W–36L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.70
Pascal Auburtin
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Blake Herrin
19W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
4
Akram Haggag
19W–44L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.28
3.5
David Walker
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tom Estes
19W–23L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
David Argenti
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Eduardo DelaPaz
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
Michael Rogers
18W–35L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Edward O'Malley
28W–28L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Raymond Shaughnessy
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.