Teams

TLaBrosse/JRafferty (Carmel)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.64 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-28vs MWolf (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Whitmore / Paige Jones vs Laurie Madonna / Lisa OBryan0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Whitmore / Keri Beach vs Janie Miller / Beth Godfrey6-3, 6-4
2023-08-31vs JKarasek (Carmel)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKeri Beach / Andrea Whitmore vs Caroline Dudley / Crystal Allen1-6, 6-7
2023-08-24vs RJampani (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Cole / Andrea Whitmore vs Antoinette Tan / Ashlee Pickering4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Keri Beach
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Andrea Whitmore
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Claire Samuels
published 2.5
2.42
Brooke Cole
published 2.5
2.35
Nadia Meredith
published
2.05
Tori LaBrosse
published
2.05
Cathy Nikrooz
published 2.5
1.95
Ashley Christman
published 2.5
1.95
Julia Rafferty
published
1.92
Emily Agnew
published 2.5
Sarah Firquin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Samuels + Nadia Meredith3260% games+1.3% vs expected
Nadia Meredith + Andrea Whitmore5153% gamesnot enough data
Keri Beach + Andrea Whitmore3252% gamesnot enough data
Tori LaBrosse + Julia Rafferty123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Keri Beach
46W–33L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Andrea Whitmore
30W–36L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
2.5
Claire Samuels
16W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%27%73%
2.58
2.5
Brooke Cole
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%74%26%
2.42
Nadia Meredith
18W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%88%12%
2.35
Tori LaBrosse
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Cathy Nikrooz
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Ashley Christman
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Julia Rafferty
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.95
2.5
Emily Agnew
1W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Sarah Firquin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.