Teams

Hills - Cheval Pacemakers/Knierman

2021 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-06-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Roig / David Dorton vs Brian Sheehan / Tim Janssen6-0, 6-2
2021-05-22vs Hills - Hunters Green/CoteyLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Knierman / Andrew Roig vs Richard Helme / Michael Bitting6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-01vs Tampa Yacht - J. FeeneyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Knierman / Andrew Roig vs Nacho La Puente / James Baker6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Andrew Roig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Amer Aldeen
published 4
Fernando Delfino
published 4
3.75
Peter Marsocci
published
Jason Crow
published
Michael Dayton
published
Sundar Srinivasan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Roig + Amer Aldeen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Roig
57W–48L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Amer Aldeen
13W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Fernando Delfino
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Peter Marsocci
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.75
Jason Crow
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Dayton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sundar Srinivasan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.