Teams

LA - Downtown Aces

2022 USTA MxD 18 & Over - LA · LA - 8.0 Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.79 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-03-25vs LA-LLW-Fremont Aces-Rebekah LeeLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew Dubbins / Elena Salinas vs Marcus Liou / Wei Zhang2-6, 3-6
2022-02-26vs LA - Queen AnneLost 02
L#1 DoublesElena Salinas / Andy Robbins vs Roy Jenkins / Tara Shultz0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaryann Brandon / Josh Albertson vs Alvaro Corzo / Shaina Zaidi4-6, 1-6
2022-02-19vs LA - R0YAL FLUSHLost 01
L#2 DoublesGabriel Moffat / Maryann Brandon vs Carlos Quintanilla / Tiffany Yuen4-6, 2-6
2022-01-30vs LA - LATC Over ServedLost 01
L#2 DoublesElena Salinas / Andy Robbins vs Nilou Panahpour / Diego Torres-Palma3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 8.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Hanre Chang
published 4.5
4.23
Marjorie Buss
published
3.61
Edmond Avedisian
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.59
Gabriel Moffat
published 4
3.48
Elena Salinas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Marion Bright
published
3.36
Matthew Boehm
published
3.36
Tina Yang
published
3.13
Tamar Stevens
published
2.94
Maryann Brandon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Fariba Navid
published 3.5
2.44
Andrea Crum
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hanre Chang
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
Marjorie Buss
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Edmond Avedisian
104W–117L career · 9 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Gabriel Moffat
1W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Elena Salinas
140W–158L career · 3 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
Marion Bright
35W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
Matthew Boehm
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Tina Yang
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Tamar Stevens
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Maryann Brandon
94W–139L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
3.5
Fariba Navid
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Andrea Crum
1W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.