Teams

TLaBrosse/Rafferty (Carmel)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-02vs MWolf/LMadonna (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKeri Beach vs Lisa OBryan5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-04-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Whitmore / Brooke Cole vs Heather Hagar / Gretchen Orr3-6, 1-6
2023-04-17vs MKearney (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulia Rafferty / Andrea Whitmore vs Kinzie Bashline / Crystal Allen1-6, 0-6
2023-04-11vs MJessee (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Whitmore / Brooke Cole vs Megan Jessee / Antoinette Tan1-6, 0-6
2023-03-28vs EScoville/VShannon (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrea Whitmore vs Theresa Joiner0-6, 1-6
2023-03-07vs MWolf/LMadonna (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Whitmore / Tori LaBrosse vs Maryann Whalen / Kristina Campbell1-6, 1-6
2023-02-28vs TThomas (Springfield)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTori LaBrosse / Andrea Whitmore vs Gretchen Orr / Deborah Feldmann1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulia Rafferty / Keri Beach vs Jillene McGovern / Kayla Meyer5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Keri Beach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.75
Andrea Whitmore
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.51
Claire Samuels
published 2.5
2.40
Nadia Meredith
published
2.28
Brooke Cole
published 2.5
2.13
Julia Rafferty
published
2.07
Tori LaBrosse
published
2.02
Cathy Nikrooz
published 2.5
1.91
Ashley Christman
published 2.5
1.89
Emily Agnew
published
Sarah Firquin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keri Beach + Andrea Whitmore3252% gamesnot enough data
Claire Samuels + Nadia Meredith314 matchesnot enough data
Tori LaBrosse + Julia Rafferty123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Keri Beach
45W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Andrea Whitmore
30W–36L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
2.5
Claire Samuels
11W–1L career · no lines in 2023
0%48%52%
2.51
Nadia Meredith
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Brooke Cole
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.28
Julia Rafferty
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Tori LaBrosse
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07
2.5
Cathy Nikrooz
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Ashley Christman
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Emily Agnew
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Sarah Firquin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.