Teams

Monguilod 18+ 4.0M Singles Sunday

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 4.0 Mens Singles Sun

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesMarko Milojevic vs Scott Wallace6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesYongjin Lee vs Tan Ren6-1, 6-3
2025-07-20vs Beuchat 18+ 4.0M Singles SundayLost 03
L#1 SinglesMarko Milojevic vs Mikael Penteado6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJohan Nordmark vs Scott Buchanan2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAndrew Hjelt vs Alexis Beuchat5-7, 3-6
2025-07-19vs Davis 18 4.0M Singles SundaySplit 11
L#1 SinglesMarko Milojevic vs Corey Davis6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAndrew Hjelt vs Charles Chuang6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-13vs Leggette 18 4.0M Singles SundayWon 21
W#1 SinglesMarko Milojevic vs Rob Newman6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAndrew Hjelt vs Scot Harrison6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesYongjin Lee vs Chris Leggette3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMarko Milojevic vs Robert Wells6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesYongjin Lee vs Robert Lynch6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesTravis Bui-Klimke vs Tan Ren6-2, 6-1
2025-06-20vs Davis 18 4.0M Singles SundayWon 10
W#1 SinglesMiguel Monguilod vs Davis Phanthalack6-2, 6-4
2025-06-08vs Leggette 18 4.0M Singles SundayLost 01
L#1 SinglesMiguel Monguilod vs Rob Newman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-01vs Beuchat 18+ 4.0M Singles SundayLost 12
W#1 SinglesMarko Milojevic vs Scott Buchanan6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJohan Nordmark vs Mikael Penteado4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAndrew Hjelt vs Alexis Beuchat6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mens Singles Sun have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Miguel Monguilod
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.92
Marko Milojevic
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.90
Johan Nordmark
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.79
Alex Dunzweiler
published 4
3.73
Andrew Hjelt
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.68
Travis Bui-Klimke
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Yongjin Lee
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Hjelt + Travis Bui-Klimke3248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Miguel Monguilod
88W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
Marko Milojevic
19W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Johan Nordmark
13W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Alex Dunzweiler
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Andrew Hjelt
24W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Travis Bui-Klimke
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Yongjin Lee
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.