Teams

Slammin Siths

2026 Mixed 18 and Over League · 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.79 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-12vs Junk Ball JedisWon 30
W#1 DoublesJamie Yamamoto / Gwen Tanaka vs Jamie Irie / Noriko Kobayashi5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarissa Hayashi / Nicholas Tran vs Alex Zavarro / Lori Nekoba6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEfren Ruiz / Sheri Kinoshita vs Kareem Khozaim / Tomoko Sakishima6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-03vs Junk Ball JedisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMalorie Murakami / Satoshi Tanaka vs Lori Nekoba / Kareem Khozaim6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEfren Ruiz / Jill Atwal vs Ezri Shin-Laakea Weiss / Kirsten White2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMari Horike / Kuakini Baltero vs Noriko Kobayashi / Glenn Takase6-3, 6-0
2026-03-29vs Junk Ball JedisWon 21
W#1 DoublesSheri Kinoshita / Wayne Yamada vs Noriko Kobayashi / Jonathan Aronce6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNicholas Tran / Kari Wicklund vs Jamie Irie / Lori Nekoba6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarissa Hayashi / Aaron Nishiura vs Alex Zavarro / Michelle Oishi6-3, 6-1
2026-03-07vs Junk Ball JedisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMalorie Murakami / Satoshi Tanaka vs Kirsten White / Ezri Shin-Laakea Weiss6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKuakini Baltero / Kari Wicklund vs Alex Zavarro / Tomoko Sakishima6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAaron Nishiura / Urumi Furuhata vs Lori Nekoba / Glenn Takase3-6, 6-7
2026-03-05vs Junk Ball JedisWon 21
W#1 DoublesUrumi Furuhata / Efren Ruiz vs Michelle Oishi / Glenn Takase6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarissa Hayashi / Aaron Nishiura vs Kirsten White / Ezri Shin-Laakea Weiss2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKuakini Baltero / Jill Atwal vs Tomoko Sakishima / Jamie Irie7-5, 6-3
2026-03-01vs Junk Ball JedisWon 30
W#1 DoublesUrumi Furuhata / Satoshi Tanaka vs Noriko Kobayashi / Glenn Takase6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJamie Yamamoto / Gwen Tanaka vs Kirsten White / Jonathan Aronce7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWayne Yamada / Mari Horike vs Kareem Khozaim / Michelle Oishi6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Slammin Siths5113513132
2Junk Ball Jedis1551328189

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Kari Wicklund
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Urumi Furuhata
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Marissa Hayashi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.81
Mari Horike
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Sheri Kinoshita
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Jill Atwal
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.56
Satoshi Tanaka
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.22
Aaron Nishiura
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.20
Gwen Tanaka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Efren Ruiz
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jamie Yamamoto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kuakini Baltero
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Malorie Murakami
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Nicholas Tran
published
Wayne Yamada
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wayne Yamada + Sheri Kinoshita4163% gamesnot enough data
Wayne Yamada + Mari Horike303 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Yamada + Gwen Tanaka303 matchesnot enough data
Sheri Kinoshita + Nicholas Tran213 matchesnot enough data
Mari Horike + Aaron Nishiura213 matchesnot enough data
Marissa Hayashi + Kuakini Baltero303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kari Wicklund
43W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.02
Urumi Furuhata
11W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Marissa Hayashi
110W–54L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Mari Horike
86W–84L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Sheri Kinoshita
179W–143L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
3.5
Jill Atwal
30W–15L career · type M · 5 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.68
Satoshi Tanaka
44W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.56
3.5
Aaron Nishiura
31W–22L career · 11 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Gwen Tanaka
88W–51L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Efren Ruiz
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jamie Yamamoto
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kuakini Baltero
23W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Malorie Murakami
101W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicholas Tran
11W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Wayne Yamada
35W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.