Teams

GOLD RIVER RC 55MX8.0A

2025 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX8.0

21 players · average NTRP 4.14 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 55&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Christine Tennant
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Kendall Homer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.14
Heather Cowan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.98
Michael Bedard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.96
Laurie Schofield
published
3.85
Kevin Rolli
published
3.83
Daniel Gong
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.82
Laura Morales
published
3.80
Rick Ray
published
3.80
Rob Lessler
published
3.80
Terry Sandoval
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.75
Lisa Fitzpatrick
published
3.72
Chetan Uttarkar
published 4
3.71
Greg Ingram
published 4
3.71
Staci Ross
published
3.61
Brad Stevens
published 4
3.60
Denise Kimes
published 4
3.60
Kelly Follett
published
3.44
Mark Silva
published
3.30
Shelley Quomri
published
3.28
Mylene Tiongco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kendall Homer + Terry Sandoval2641% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Tennant
31W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
4.38
Kendall Homer
20W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Heather Cowan
23W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
4.14
Michael Bedard
15W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
Laurie Schofield
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
Kevin Rolli
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Daniel Gong
15W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Laura Morales
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Rick Ray
15W–25L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Rob Lessler
30W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Terry Sandoval
19W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Lisa Fitzpatrick
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Chetan Uttarkar
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Greg Ingram
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Staci Ross
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Brad Stevens
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Denise Kimes
14W–18L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.60
Kelly Follett
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Mark Silva
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Shelley Quomri
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Mylene Tiongco
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.