Teams

MSU Dillinger FWL A18-4.0M

2022 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player)

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-12-12vs WH Custodio FWL A18-4.0MSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichael Gonzales / Jared Stratz vs Zachary Hickner / Mike West6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSergey Ilyashov vs Jeremy Andrick4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChristopher Cuyar vs Jeremy Nufer2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesZachary Dillinger / Peter Perez vs Erik Larsen / Curtis Leibbrand4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-10-16vs MVC Schmitt FWL A18-4.0MLost 14
L#1 DoublesJason Perez / Krishnan Sudharsan vs Andrew Chuba / Brad Devries3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJason Kraft vs John Titley0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesZachary Dillinger / Jared Stratz vs Eddy Schmitt / Ken Walton1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSeth Speers vs Kevin Shaw0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Gonzales / Kee Tsai vs Paul Brown / Dan Kennard4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI FWL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Christopher Cuyar
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.71
Sergey Ilyashov
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.69
Raju Pusapati
published
3.65
Jared Stratz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Zachary Dillinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Dean Baker
published 3
Jade Collins
published
Jason Kraft
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kee Tsai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Krishnan Sudharsan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Gonzales
published
Peter Perez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Santosh Gunturu
published
Seth Speers
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Cuyar + Sergey Ilyashov13855% games+1.4% vs expected
Jared Stratz + Michael Gonzales7158% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Cuyar + Zachary Dillinger224 matchesnot enough data
Peter Perez + Zachary Dillinger314 matchesnot enough data
Raju Pusapati + Zachary Dillinger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Cuyar
33W–27L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Sergey Ilyashov
27W–20L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Raju Pusapati
21W–16L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Jared Stratz
27W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Zachary Dillinger
15W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.54
3
Dean Baker
1W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jade Collins
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jason Kraft
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kee Tsai
15W–27L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Krishnan Sudharsan
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Michael Gonzales
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Perez
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Santosh Gunturu
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Seth Speers
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.